Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » Remote Mining with Vengance.
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance. |
Wed, 06 August 2003 21:43 |
|
|
alexdstewart wrote on Tue, 05 August 2003 19:41 | Yes, Yes I am testing the race now...
I am NOT STUPID and know perfectly well that a -m race of conventional design doesn't stand a chance. But who said that I designed a conventional -m race? I designed an -f mineless race!
|
Micha suggested that I read this thread, and respond to it. I had a few opinions that I was going to post. But after reading these last few posts, I HAVE to post my comments to these first.
In my younger days of folly I did something similar to the game listed above...
Here is a clip from my message to the other players at the end of the game...
"To begin with, I decided that I wanted to play a Space Demolotion, as I had never played that before. I decided that I would play a very isolationist race, and not let anyone share my space, even allies.
My biggest mistake was not testing my race design. I would guess I was busy with work or something, but I did not have much time. So I threw together a race, tested it one quick time, and sent in the race file.
I built a -f -m race. (no Factories, no Mines). And I took all the advanced mining options. I figured that the remote miners would provide me with enough minerals to expand. This was a major problem actually. My lack of minerals in the early years really hampered my growth.
One of the better points was that all my extra resources went either into terraforming or research, as I never needed to build the mines or factories. This is why I started out in the lead in tech.
I have another Stars! friend, in Belgium actually, that accused me
of liking to torture myself after he looked at my files. First of all SD takes a lot of MM (Micro Management). And then of course so does remote mining. So I had basically built a broken race that was MM Hell.
And my friend laughed at me, and casually mentioned that you should NEVER combine an SD with a mining race. Both require extra design slots. So again, I had to do extra management, this time to keep my number of designs down. The one GOOD point related to this was that as my 'bad' LRT (one of from the list was required) I had taken BET (Bleeding Edge Tech) which further reduced the cost of older designs. Toward the end my chaff were costing me 9 resources each and my Jihad cruisers were less than 150 if I remember.
So I was very protective of my minerals and mining ships and mining planets.
[cutting out game specific details...]
Given the race I was playing I was very happy to get to second place. I never expected to be able to do that. I give credit in two places: 1) help from the XXXXXXXXX especially in the tech that helped me get the best mining robot and 2) positioning. In the end I may have the largest area of any race in the game. If someone had run into me earlier, I could easily have have been taken out. I achieved one VC, and could have achieved a second
in another 1-2 turns. And if I had wanted a third VC, I could have colonized all my mining planets, but I really did not want to do this as then I would have no mineral sources.
Playing SD was fun. I like the minefields and learned a lot about how to do it fairly well, though I never really took the time to do an 'expert' job. One thing that was VERY nice was the ability to go through other minefields at a much higher speed. Enemy minefields seldom slowed me down, as my sweepers could go in to sweep the fields at high speeds (warp 7 or with very little
chance of getting hit. And a cloaked pen-scanning super minelayer was fun too.
I would recommend against anyone ever playing a race with remote miners and no mining capability on your main planets, unless maybe you play AR."
You can stop laughing now. It is over.
To add in a few more comments: a race like this MUST spend all of it's starting minerals on remote miners and a few transports. Otherwise you are just plain dead, as you will not have enough minerals even to get started. And you need to stay focused on building transports and remote miners, otherwise t
...
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Fri, 01 August 2003 20:33
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: LEit on Sat, 02 August 2003 11:04
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: LEit on Sat, 02 August 2003 11:07
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: vonboy on Sun, 14 September 2003 15:51
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: iztok on Mon, 15 September 2003 04:50
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Mon, 15 September 2003 13:58
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Sun, 03 August 2003 00:13
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Mon, 04 August 2003 21:06
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Sun, 03 August 2003 00:10
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Mon, 04 August 2003 21:08
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Tue, 05 August 2003 01:00
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: iztok on Tue, 05 August 2003 07:08
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sinla on Tue, 05 August 2003 08:15
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Wed, 06 August 2003 00:13
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Coyote on Wed, 06 August 2003 00:33
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: iztok on Wed, 06 August 2003 03:03
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: iztok on Thu, 07 August 2003 05:06
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sinla on Thu, 07 August 2003 07:11
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Tue, 05 August 2003 21:51
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: xdude on Wed, 06 August 2003 20:34
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Deuce on Wed, 06 August 2003 20:59
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Wed, 06 August 2003 21:13
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Wed, 06 August 2003 23:07
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: vonboy on Thu, 07 August 2003 09:48
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Thu, 07 August 2003 14:21
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Tue, 12 August 2003 05:04
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Tue, 12 August 2003 05:33
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: iztok on Wed, 13 August 2003 02:04
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Wed, 27 August 2003 17:52
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Thu, 28 August 2003 16:01
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Madman on Wed, 26 November 2003 05:03
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Wed, 27 August 2003 19:40
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Fri, 29 August 2003 02:24
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: regiss on Fri, 29 August 2003 04:47
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Fri, 29 August 2003 14:29
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Sat, 30 August 2003 15:05
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Sun, 31 August 2003 14:33
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Sun, 31 August 2003 22:26
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Mon, 01 September 2003 10:18
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: freakyboy on Mon, 01 September 2003 11:08
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Mon, 01 September 2003 14:04
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Sotek on Fri, 05 September 2003 00:44
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: iztok on Fri, 05 September 2003 01:43
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: Kotk on Wed, 10 September 2003 10:01
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
|
|
|
Re: Remote Mining with Vengance.
By: LEit on Wed, 26 November 2003 13:42
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 19 20:29:27 EDT 2024
|