Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » HP, HG or -F
Re: HP, HG or -F |
Tue, 18 November 2003 02:21 |
|
Sinla | | Warrant Officer | Messages: 132
Registered: February 2003 Location: the Netherlands | |
|
Cirrus wrote on Tue, 18 November 2003 07:28 | What do HP, HG, -f actually mean?
|
Those are referred to as the 'basic' economymodels (page 5 of the custom race wizard):
HP = Hyperproducer: 1/2500 popeff., but factories at least something like 15/8/21. Ramps up quite (well, very) slow, but the maximumoutput per planet in resources is higher. Don't forget the checkbox
HG = Hypergrowth: 1/1000 popeff, 'standard' factories (12/9/16 is best, but could be less effecient). Ramps up pretty fast, less resources on each planet.
-f = factorlyless: popeff. is best kept at 1/1000, but if they think they can afford it, people sometimes take 1/900 (or even better?). Factories at 5/25/5, you don't build any!
This is compensated by the great habs (1i is probably best) and some great tech (3.5 cheap), which you both can afford due to the lack of points you spend on your factorysettings. Strong starter, bit weak in the midgame (try build a BB ).
1WW (OWW) = 1 world wonder. Great factories, great everything really. Except all habs are at their narrowest (and mostly on the right edge). You don't see these too often (maybe some tiny universe for fun). Observer races also have these settings most of the time.
QS = Quick start. Great facs and research. Bit low on the habs, made up by speed in the beginning of a game. sometimes referred to as a hybrid IIRC (a bit HG, a bit HP),
HTH
[Updated on: Tue, 18 November 2003 11:46]
If you can't beat me... Run away...Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: regiss on Thu, 12 June 2003 04:14
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Steve on Thu, 12 June 2003 08:38
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Thu, 12 June 2003 09:57
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Hetzer on Thu, 12 June 2003 16:02
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Ashlyn on Thu, 12 June 2003 17:10
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Fri, 13 June 2003 08:38
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: LEit on Fri, 13 June 2003 10:05
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: LEit on Fri, 13 June 2003 10:33
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Hetzer on Fri, 13 June 2003 14:13
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sotek on Fri, 13 June 2003 00:38
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Fri, 13 June 2003 08:26
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Fri, 13 June 2003 15:21
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Ron on Fri, 13 June 2003 17:46
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: zoid on Fri, 13 June 2003 03:14
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sotek on Fri, 13 June 2003 17:55
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: mlaub on Sun, 23 November 2003 14:23
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: joseph on Thu, 19 June 2003 13:09
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Kotk on Thu, 26 June 2003 10:20
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: joseph on Wed, 09 July 2003 13:18
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sotek on Wed, 09 July 2003 13:48
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Wed, 09 July 2003 17:16
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Cirrus on Tue, 18 November 2003 01:28
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sinla on Tue, 18 November 2003 02:21
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Steve on Tue, 18 November 2003 10:18
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Micha on Tue, 18 November 2003 11:27
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sinla on Tue, 18 November 2003 11:45
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 18 20:35:03 EDT 2024
|