Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » HP, HG or -F
Re: HP, HG or -F |
Thu, 12 June 2003 11:51 |
|
Crusader | | Officer Cadet 2nd Year | Messages: 233
Registered: January 2003 Location: Dixie Land | |
|
I have played more HG than HP, simply because it is easier to play especially in the later stages of the game. -f intrigues me, and I have played and testbedded many, various configurations of them. I've just never been brave enough, yet, to play one in a PBEM. Perhaps this year will be the one. After I get my new laptop, ofc.
The only HP that I have played in a PBEM was a SS with ARM. It was awesome in the late stages of the game. I was regularly creating battle fleets with 95-98% cloaking using gatable Nubians. The AR race that was trying to assimilate me went nuts trying to pin me down. Yeah, he knew where my planets were, but he never knew when or where my fleets would pop up. After losing around 5 large invasion fleets and then losing a comparable number of Death Stars, he kinda decided that maybe an AR with twice the resources didn't have a decided advantage after all. I've mentioned this particular game before. I must be proud.
Forgive my smirk.
My dream race, which is totally OT but HEY!, it's the way I think, would be a -f SS race with IS's grow in space capability. I always liked the idea, probably propagated by the way the original Stars! looked, where stealth is a LRT, not a PRT, and the extra cloaking devices and hulls would come from a tech tree.
Dream on ... dream on.
The Crusader
Nothing for now.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: regiss on Thu, 12 June 2003 04:14
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Steve on Thu, 12 June 2003 08:38
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Thu, 12 June 2003 09:57
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Hetzer on Thu, 12 June 2003 16:02
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Ashlyn on Thu, 12 June 2003 17:10
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Fri, 13 June 2003 08:38
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: LEit on Fri, 13 June 2003 10:05
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: LEit on Fri, 13 June 2003 10:33
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Hetzer on Fri, 13 June 2003 14:13
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sotek on Fri, 13 June 2003 00:38
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Fri, 13 June 2003 08:26
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Fri, 13 June 2003 15:21
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Ron on Fri, 13 June 2003 17:46
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: zoid on Fri, 13 June 2003 03:14
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sotek on Fri, 13 June 2003 17:55
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: mlaub on Sun, 23 November 2003 14:23
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: joseph on Thu, 19 June 2003 13:09
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Kotk on Thu, 26 June 2003 10:20
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: joseph on Wed, 09 July 2003 13:18
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sotek on Wed, 09 July 2003 13:48
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Paladin on Wed, 09 July 2003 17:16
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Cirrus on Tue, 18 November 2003 01:28
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sinla on Tue, 18 November 2003 02:21
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Steve on Tue, 18 November 2003 10:18
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Micha on Tue, 18 November 2003 11:27
|
|
|
Re: HP, HG or -F
By: Sinla on Tue, 18 November 2003 11:45
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 18 21:01:40 EDT 2024
|