| Re: EYITYOTG has ended |
Thu, 09 June 2016 04:44   |
|
 Mac1 |
 | Chief Warrant Officer 2 |
Messages: 159
Registered: November 2008 | |
|
I also don't think we broke any game rules.
I played previously in dynamic duos and this game was intended for 2-player alliances from start to end and so it was played.
Here, was just normal "diplomatic" game, with some minor restrictions. But it was never said that you can co-operate with only one player, that you can't trade, can't intersettle etc.
It was only made harder by relation limitation
And it was said that at the end maximum of 2 player-alliance can claim victory.
I have done everything right.
I didn't have an "obvious ally" from the beginning (like in Dynamic Duos), I was alone. I could either die alone to overwhelming power, or co-operate with Coder/Illuminati, choice was obvious.
Altruist wrote on Wed, 08 June 2016 16:26 so I beg you not to accuse me of stupidity, I am treating you with respect as well.
My apology about that.
I used wrong word. I rahter meant that it is naive to think that players will not unite and fight together vs much stronger enemy.
Yes, in most games they actually don't (which i hate, because i usually try to unite vs winning player/team), but in this kind of game, i think its easier, because everybody more or less sees the middle and knows what is going on.
[Updated on: Thu, 09 June 2016 04:52] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
