Home » Primary Racial Traits » IT » -f benchmarks (IT or ithers) (Should a -f race monster conventionally?)
| Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers) |
Mon, 17 September 2012 22:55   |
|
 Mark Hewitt |
 | Master Chief Petty Officer |
Messages: 105
Registered: June 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada | |
|
LittleEddie wrote on Mon, 17 September 2012 18:32RS is not an option! It's a must have.
You can question that as much as you want, but without RS, you are going to lose.
Hear, hear!
And -f is a subset of QS.
QS with factories usually means pop 1/1000, factories 12/8/x/3 or 4; or 1/2500 and 15/6/x/3, with mines 10/3/y, where x and y are around 17 or so. Mines have to be cheap and factories have to pay back their cost quickly, with 12/8 that's under 7 years and with 15/6 that's in 4 years. Techs are usually all exp, exp start at 3 (or 4 for JOAT), except Weapons is as cheap as the game allows.
With both QS -f and +f you send out a lot of scouts early, 10+, and grab as much real estate as possible. And you plan to hold on to it.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
-f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Wed, 12 September 2012 14:32 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Thu, 13 September 2012 04:07 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Thu, 13 September 2012 09:54 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Thu, 13 September 2012 15:19 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Fri, 14 September 2012 05:07 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sat, 15 September 2012 03:12 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Sat, 15 September 2012 14:37 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 03:17 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Sun, 16 September 2012 08:39 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Coyote on Sat, 15 September 2012 18:20 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Sat, 15 September 2012 22:39 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 03:10 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 13:14 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Coyote on Sun, 16 September 2012 14:44 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 14:47 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 17 September 2012 02:17 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 17 September 2012 04:54 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 17 September 2012 07:37 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Mon, 17 September 2012 23:12 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Coyote on Tue, 18 September 2012 01:56 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Tue, 18 September 2012 06:16 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Tue, 18 September 2012 08:44 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Tue, 18 September 2012 10:32 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Tue, 18 September 2012 12:35 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Wed, 19 September 2012 06:07 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Wed, 19 September 2012 09:15 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Wed, 19 September 2012 13:51 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Thu, 20 September 2012 11:27 |
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: ccmaster on Mon, 01 October 2012 15:25 |
|
 |
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 01 October 2012 13:58 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 16 16:40:26 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
