Home » Primary Racial Traits » IT » -f benchmarks (IT or ithers) (Should a -f race monster conventionally?)
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers) |
Sun, 16 September 2012 03:17 |
|
XAPBob | | Lt. Commander | Messages: 957
Registered: August 2012 | |
|
Altruist wrote on Sat, 15 September 2012 14:37I guess the race is NOT made for a lengthy big game but for a fast paced game in a small universe with lots of expected early trouble?
Assuming this, the design looks very good.
Only finetune I'd suggest:
Cost of mines from 4 to 3. It's cheap race-pts-wise and mines can be built a rocking 25% cheaper/faster. Only spot where to scrab the pts from for this would be to tinker a bit with the habs.
Concerning your initial question about test beds and results: they work extremely bad for -f. And while economy is important also for a -f, in comparison to factory-races the quickstart ability and early tactical expansion of a -f is such a more important factor that it is v:ery difficult to measure and to compare.
About your research strat just one hint:
IMHO weap is prime even for the IT. And while the con-10-gates are great (and later on needed), you get along with the standard gates for quite a while. An IT can just do so much more with those standard gates than the other PRTs without having constant losses to the void.
Mines 3 is an option, although the economic impact isn't as focussed as they don't compound. I could also drop to 11 operated as I've not got a complete set of mines anywhere yet (2 points remaining to go on either mines or minerals)
I only get the C10 gates after W12 - the starting gates are excellent with IT overgating, my LF can't gate with complete immunity, but they're close enough, especially with healing.
[Updated on: Sun, 16 September 2012 05:33] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
-f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Wed, 12 September 2012 14:32
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Thu, 13 September 2012 04:07
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Thu, 13 September 2012 09:54
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Thu, 13 September 2012 15:19
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Fri, 14 September 2012 05:07
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sat, 15 September 2012 03:12
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Sat, 15 September 2012 14:37
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 03:17
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Sun, 16 September 2012 08:39
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Coyote on Sat, 15 September 2012 18:20
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Sat, 15 September 2012 22:39
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 03:10
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 13:14
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Coyote on Sun, 16 September 2012 14:44
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Sun, 16 September 2012 14:47
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 17 September 2012 02:17
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 17 September 2012 04:54
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 17 September 2012 07:37
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Mon, 17 September 2012 23:12
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Coyote on Tue, 18 September 2012 01:56
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Tue, 18 September 2012 06:16
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Tue, 18 September 2012 08:44
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Tue, 18 September 2012 10:32
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Tue, 18 September 2012 12:35
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Wed, 19 September 2012 06:07
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Wed, 19 September 2012 09:15
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: Altruist on Wed, 19 September 2012 13:51
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Thu, 20 September 2012 11:27
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: ccmaster on Mon, 01 October 2012 15:25
|
|
|
Re: -f benchmarks (IT or ithers)
By: XAPBob on Mon, 01 October 2012 13:58
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 16 12:53:40 EDT 2024
|