Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Bar » NAP Breaker or not?
NAP Breaker or not? Fri, 17 February 2012 04:40 Go to previous message
Mac1 is currently offline Mac1

 
Chief Warrant Officer 2

Messages: 159
Registered: November 2008
Like in title, i need Your advice about our situation.

From my perspective NAP is clearly broken, i play many other military MP games and in each such situation would be called as NAP breaking. But i dont have enough experience on this area in stars!.
Slimdragoon claims he did everything fine. So i need advice to solve it out. Here is the situation:

We have a simple NAP-5 treaty.
Mac (me) playing Undeads
Slim playing Dragonoids.
Dragonoids are at war with Psilons
Undeads are at war with Airstrip

I was preparing to attack another of Airstrip Planet, named Planet9, i was sweeping mines atm.
Then i receive an e-mail from Dragonoids that i can't attack planet for at least 5 turns beacuse he is using the planet as trading route to his front line with Psilons (it might be fair, but Dragonoids already have several other gates at Psilon border, so for me the reason was fake, but it's not about it).

I replied that I'm at war with Airstrip and i have a right to attack his planets anytime i want to and I warned him to move the fleets away. (he replied that he wont do it, but i didnt receive this email before generation).

I did attack the planet, killing as well some of dragonoid ships that were on orbit (not many but always something). Next turn Dragonoid attacked me at several fronts doing much damage, without any warning or information.


So what you think about that ?
He claims that i cant attack Airstrip planets, beacuse his fleet is there. And i did broke a NAP doing this. For me such logic is really unacceptable. If this is true, i can protect an ally by moving fleet to every his planet.

And what i really hate is that a player being on 1st place needs such tricks to kill another ...

Thanks for explanations, Mac



Edit: changing thread title.. i think. Ash


[Updated on: Wed, 22 February 2012 22:30] by Moderator


Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Defining "standard" NAP
Next Topic: Diplomacy - honour vs credibility
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 15 10:38:46 EDT 2024