Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Bar » Sense of playing a senseless game?
| Sense of playing a senseless game? |
Sun, 14 August 2011 19:37  |
|
| Taka Tuka |
 | Master Chief Petty Officer |
Messages: 102
Registered: March 2004
Location: Germany | |
|
Hi guys,
I would like to get some opinions about a special case:
In a team-game (WOL V) with 4 teams of 2 players without rules, except up to 1 CA in each team only, 2 teams do ally after (maybe before) the first 6 years. Both teams are designed for early wars. 1 team can win only!
No question, to ally it's not against the rules, because there are no rules. So even pregame-alliances were not forbidden.
BUT does it make sense to do this in a game of 4 teams only? 
IMO at least it will be a game between the two allied teams only, after the supernumeraries - the other two teams - are eliminated.
So I'm asking you folks, if out of your point of view it makes sense for the two - at least - needless teams to continue playing this game under this circumstances or if they HAVE to continue playing.
I would like to stop playing this game and to ask the two allied teams to play THEIR game alone (why they not look for a host to play such games with two teams only (team-duell) without stealing time of other players?  ).
Would it be o.k. to leave the two allied teams play alone - means, asking the HOST for setting the other teams to inactive?
YOUR OPINION?
Thx, Taka Tuka
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Current Time: Thu May 16 05:12:04 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
