Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » Why bi-immunity is a bad idea.
Why bi-immunity is a bad idea. Tue, 05 July 2011 06:58 Go to previous message
magic9mushroom is currently offline magic9mushroom

 
Commander

Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008
Even for AR and HE, who can take fairly low growth and at least consider the idea.

Compare these two hab schemes:

Grav immune/Temp (-120)-120/Rad 16-84

vs.

Grav immune/Temp immune/Rad 64-84.

The first starts with 47% of planets green, 12% over 75% habitability.

The second starts with 21% of planets green, 13% over 75% habitability.

The first reaches 98% green, 49% >75%.

The second reaches 52% green, 43% >75%.

The second costs more RW points, BTW.

Conclusion: 1-immune 2-wide is pretty much strictly better than 2-immune 1-narrow, largely because the second immunity costs so much more than the first.


(Yes, I know that most experienced players will know this, but some newbies won't.)

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Game setup for HP viability
Next Topic: minelaying + OoE + Move merge Heal
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon May 13 22:50:49 EDT 2024