| Re: SS race design critique |
Thu, 10 September 2009 22:40   |
|
|
|
Of yes, I agree entirely Matt. And there was a reason I suggested getting *more* cheap techs to the OP too. I think 1-cheap is a very dangerous place to be, a 'worst of all worlds' sort of tech setting, given such a big chunk of the points comes from making that last field expensive too.
It was just the suggestion it could never be a good choice 
I think SS is generally better off with tech cheap - leverages that tech bonus. But tech exp *is* a playable option.
Usually I play with 3.5 cheap, but not always.
[Updated on: Thu, 10 September 2009 22:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
