Re: Why 3%? |
Wed, 03 December 2008 14:00 |
|
neilhoward | | Commander | Messages: 1112
Registered: April 2008 Location: SW3 & 10023 | |
|
Better pop efficiency and lower factory costs both argue for 3% in my book. This helps on both ends. Faster factory compounding and better max resources per planet. Lower growth rate helps justify having a larger percent of total pop in transit each year afaic. If you are willing to go as low as 4%, you might as well take 3%.
[Updated on: Wed, 03 December 2008 14:08] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|