| Re: 2450; 25K; En normal; non-AccBBS; tiny dense. |
Sun, 30 September 2007 20:39   |
|
| Soobie |
 | Officer Cadet 3rd Year |
Messages: 270
Registered: May 2007
Location: Australia | |
|
| Machalot wrote on Thu, 27 September 2007 13:46 |
Is the average planet value a weighted average?
|
This is the explanatory thread of how to use KotKs economy formula:
http://starsautohost.org/sahforum/index.php?t=msg&th=352 8&start=0&rid=1075&S=a1df3c92ecc44f6f9c4ee67524f 4a79e
RE: Testing. I just find it too easy to get over 25K with AccBBs, small normal and have OK tech with most PRTs (nothing like what you can get with a CA or HE of course) - its not a good indicator. Small, normal non-AccBBS or Tiny, Dense is more vaguely more realistic imho, although non-AccBBS skews my race design too much.
For AR I would think cheap Con is more important than cheap En, with the savings on En normal going towards hab, but that's just me. In my (albeit very beginner) tests, AR is short on RW and the value of higher En tapers faster than wider hab and bigger planetary populations and more well maintained CAGR once the divisor is set, as far as I can tell. If I were to limit myself to 2.5 cheap, I would tend towards W,Con cheap, En normal.
I'll leave it to better AR players than I to decide on the merits of cheap versus normal En and testing in different size universes. I was just asking a novice question 
Cheers,
S.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
