Home » Old Game Forums » Bab5v2 team » Tact & Strat
Re: Tact & Strat |
Sat, 26 May 2007 14:34 |
|
|
Skaffen wrote on Sat, 26 May 2007 19:50 |
Altruist wrote on Fri, 25 May 2007 16:43 | In the last turns I realized several things:
1) Fighting BBs with up to weap 14 is possible with high enough numbers of cruisers with weap10. But weap10-CCs have no chance vs weap16-BBs, especially when shields are rendered useless by the powerful phased sappers.
|
Yup, but itīs also possible to fight W16 BBs with W14 CCs. Especially if you have RS and rams. Once we have prop 13 though with the EP, thatīs also pretty good. Iīm not sure if Iīll really want to go the BB way. As Iīve mentioned before, Graham in FA has taught me newfound respect for CCs.
|
True. I just wanted to stress the point that especially you and me (with the most weap10-CCs) should try to make heavy and good usage of our fleets BEFORE the VA's weap16-BBs arrive.
About using CCs when BBs are available:
As soon as you start thinking about capacitors, super-comps or jammers... it leads to BBs.
Skaffen wrote on Sat, 26 May 2007 19:50 |
Quote: |
4) If we make a combined attack against the Vorlons via gates, we better use shipdesigns which can be transfered AND stacked.
Altogether I think we should keep in mind and discuss a bit more towards the aim that our main warships and bombers of the next generation are of the same design.
|
Yes and no, e.g. I was seriously thinking about using armored BBs, since I made the mistake of not taking RS I might as well make use of it. In FA I crunched the numbers and found that contrary to popular wisdom it was economically sensible to put organic armor on them, though in that case I had quite a high bio level from an MT. Will have to re-calculate that here...
Next thing EP (or whatever other toy some or us might get), not everyone has it, but itīd be stupid not to use it once itīs available (if ever, but Pak are making great progress there).
|
True.
But we really need the ability to stack our ships when we want to make a joint attack. Perhaps it is not necesary that all 4 of us build the same design... but 2-3 should agree at least on 2 main warship-designs: 1 laser-design, 1 missile-design
[Updated on: Sat, 26 May 2007 17:01] by Moderator
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Tact & Strat
By: Altruist on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:13
|
|
|
Foch - Franklin Expedition
By: Altruist on Fri, 23 March 2007 10:05
|
|
|
Gate Planets
By: Altruist on Wed, 28 March 2007 18:48
|
|
|
Defending against Elders
By: Altruist on Wed, 28 March 2007 19:17
|
|
|
Gaim/Llort & Shadow/Mars relations
By: Altruist on Thu, 29 March 2007 08:41
|
|
|
Big bad Vorlonen fleet heading for Drakh HW
By: Altruist on Thu, 29 March 2007 19:25
|
|
|
Re: Big bad Vorlonen fleet heading for Drakh HW
|
|
|
Re: Big bad Vorlonen fleet heading for Drakh HW
By: Altruist on Fri, 30 March 2007 01:34
|
|
|
Re: Battle Positions: Drakh HW & Vorlon attack
By: Altruist on Wed, 04 April 2007 17:54
|
|
|
Re: Battle Positions: Drakh HW & Vorlon attack
|
|
|
Vorlon & Hyak Fleet Movement
By: Altruist on Fri, 06 April 2007 22:38
|
|
|
Re: Vorlon & Hyak Fleet Movement
|
|
|
Hykas have Spoo set as "friends"
By: Altruist on Sat, 07 April 2007 00:32
|
|
|
Chaff design
By: Altruist on Sun, 15 April 2007 18:23
|
|
|
Re: Chaff design
|
|
|
2465: Drakh HW 2nd round
By: Altruist on Tue, 17 April 2007 18:07
|
|
|
Re: 2465: Drakh HW 2nd round
By: Micha on Tue, 17 April 2007 18:16
|
|
|
Re: 2465: Drakh HW 2nd round
|
|
|
Transfering Red Pirates to the Spoo to get local pen-scans
By: Altruist on Mon, 30 April 2007 19:48
|
|
|
Red Pirates
|
|
|
Narn Warships
|
|
|
Re: Narn Warships
|
|
|
Re: Narn Warships
|
|
|
Re: Narn Warships
|
|
|
Alcoa & Strat
|
|
|
Re: Alcoa & Strat
By: Micha on Mon, 21 May 2007 03:28
|
|
|
Re: Alcoa & Strat
|
|
|
Re: Alcoa
|
|
|
Re: Alcoa
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
By: Skaffen on Sat, 26 May 2007 13:50
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
By: Micha on Sat, 26 May 2007 17:13
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
By: Skaffen on Sun, 27 May 2007 02:50
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
By: mlaub on Sun, 27 May 2007 12:02
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
By: Skaffen on Sun, 27 May 2007 12:13
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
By: mlaub on Sun, 27 May 2007 18:25
|
|
|
Re: Tact & Strat
|
|
|
Gaim Attack Fleet
|
|
|
Re: Gaim Attack Fleet
By: Skaffen on Sat, 26 May 2007 16:45
|
|
|
email-communication
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP?
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP?
By: Skaffen on Sun, 15 July 2007 05:53
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - transferring ships
By: Micha on Sun, 15 July 2007 07:07
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP?
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP?
By: Skaffen on Sun, 15 July 2007 07:32
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - gating
By: Micha on Sun, 15 July 2007 08:09
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - gating
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - gating
By: Skaffen on Mon, 16 July 2007 00:05
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - gating
By: Micha on Mon, 16 July 2007 03:07
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - Dog House
By: Micha on Mon, 16 July 2007 07:27
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - cloaked galleons
By: Micha on Mon, 16 July 2007 09:12
|
|
|
Re: 2494 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - cloaked galleons/Gates
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP? - cloaked galleons
By: Micha on Wed, 25 July 2007 19:37
|
|
|
Re: 2492 - Attacking Abel ASAP?
By: Micha on Thu, 26 July 2007 03:18
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1
By: Skaffen on Sun, 29 July 2007 13:26
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1
By: Micha on Wed, 01 August 2007 09:49
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1
|
|
|
Re: mine sweepers
By: Altruist on Thu, 02 August 2007 14:41
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1 - TIMING
By: Micha on Mon, 13 August 2007 11:10
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1 - TIMING
By: Skaffen on Thu, 30 August 2007 13:08
|
|
|
2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
By: Micha on Wed, 05 September 2007 15:15
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. pak ship numbers
By: Micha on Wed, 05 September 2007 15:20
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
By: Micha on Tue, 04 September 2007 15:33
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
|
|
|
Re: 2503 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy (adjusted)
By: Micha on Wed, 05 September 2007 04:53
|
|
|
Re: 2504 - Attacking Abel: Battlegrid & IA Roles
|
|
|
Re: 2504 - Attacking Abel: Battlegrid & IA Roles
By: Skaffen on Tue, 11 September 2007 23:45
|
|
|
Re: 2504 - Attacking Abel: Battlegrid & IA Roles
By: Micha on Wed, 12 September 2007 06:50
|
|
|
Re: 2506 - Ship transfers for Squidcakes Attack
|
|
|
Re: 2506 - Ship transfers for Squidcakes Attack
By: Micha on Wed, 19 September 2007 17:40
|
|
|
Re: 2495 - Attacking Abel. The Strategy - part 1 - TIMING
|
|
|
Planetary Tech Exchange between West & East
By: Altruist on Wed, 08 August 2007 07:01
|
|
|
Re: Planetary Tech Exchange between West & East
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 04 19:24:55 EDT 2024
|