Home » Stars! Clones, Extensions, Modding » Stars! Nova - Open Discussion and Help » Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars! |
Sat, 27 January 2007 01:05 |
|
|
If you're looking for ideas, there's plenty of them - and I mean plenty, scattered in the FreeStars subforum here.
Some I'd like to see are...
Optionalization of AR, selected in the econ screen, instead of having it available as a PRT.
Removal or alteration of Claim Adjuster instaforming ability, or combination with a thematic negative trait to limit its power.
Toys for Packet Physics, such as a ship-mountable mass driver that fits onto bomb slots, consuming minerals in the cargo hold to inflict massive point blank packet damage. Or, some sort of special hull that allows firing of mass packets from fleets to strike from a distance, again using minerals in the cargo space.
Balancing conventional torpedoes as a viable weapon option. As it stands they will need longer range than capital ship missiles to be effective, or else the combination of sappers and cap missiles is simply too powerful to compete against without changing the price/power of torpedoes drastically enough to introduce new balance problems.
Re-introduction of the area effect weapons seen in older versions of Stars!, again paying attention to balance issues.
A new weapon group (ballistics?) that ignores shields and deals damage to armor directly, thus creating an excuse to use ship-mounted armor and reducing the ubiquitousness of Regen Shields.
Make ramscoops less agile in combat than conventional engines. Reduce fuel capacities of warship hulls. This will make support ships more important.
Nerfing the rapid technological increase in weapon power/research cost compared to increase in defensive items power/research cost. Eg. perhaps jammers should be a little more powerful than computers of equivalent tech level, since the computers also grant an initiative bonus. Perhaps armors should be more cost-effective.
Add some more incentive to research Biotechnology.
Possible: mix-and-match trait selection instead of PRT/LRT model. Would require careful balancing but could allow far greater variety of available races, and less predictability of what an opponent is capable of. This could be very difficult to balance effectively, as different traits will have different synergetic interactions with each other.
Iconian wrote on Fri, 26 January 2007 20:41 |
But the problem is that in a multiplayer game, all players going into a battle would need to be available to post orders. And people aren't often always online at once.
|
Not to mention the difficulty of controlling hundreds of individual ships....
[Updated on: Sat, 27 January 2007 01:26] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Wed, 24 January 2007 17:48
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Thu, 25 January 2007 00:01
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Fri, 26 January 2007 16:16
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Fri, 26 January 2007 16:25
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Fri, 26 January 2007 23:41
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Coyote on Sat, 27 January 2007 01:05
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Sat, 27 January 2007 06:19
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Sat, 27 January 2007 06:07
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Sat, 27 January 2007 10:51
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Sat, 27 January 2007 12:15
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: sirgwain on Sat, 27 January 2007 16:25
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: sirgwain on Sat, 27 January 2007 16:41
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Sat, 27 January 2007 22:01
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Sun, 28 January 2007 04:44
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Sun, 28 January 2007 16:12
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Sun, 28 January 2007 17:24
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Sun, 28 January 2007 17:50
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Mon, 29 January 2007 06:04
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Coyote on Mon, 29 January 2007 05:40
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: sirgwain on Mon, 29 January 2007 14:46
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Mon, 29 January 2007 16:11
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Coyote on Tue, 30 January 2007 05:18
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Mon, 29 January 2007 13:55
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Iconian on Tue, 30 January 2007 11:54
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Coyote on Wed, 31 January 2007 02:29
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: gible on Wed, 31 January 2007 04:07
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: Coyote on Thu, 01 February 2007 07:03
|
|
|
Re: Nova - How should it be different to Stars!
By: ken-reed on Thu, 01 February 2007 16:19
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed May 01 18:12:30 EDT 2024
|