| Re: Cool HE |
Mon, 11 December 2006 13:33   |
|
 Neo the White |
 | Master Chief Petty Officer |
Messages: 96
Registered: December 2006 | |
|
Thanks for welcome
As to response... I do not view all tech expensive as an disadvantage. all my races are made so. it gives the points I need to have good factory settings. I want to have productive population and good factories and mines. the cost of mine is IMO also OK for the race can afford it. unlike a race with population workefficiency of 1/2500. So there will be no working mines as you see I have it 10/21.
I aim towards long time high production and strong settings at now but I am not into rushing for the max. What is a race that makes 15k or 25k resources at end of 50 turns and then if it will have 2 times less resources at the later years??? No I don't think that this is success or anything and you know hard play is part of the game.
I also can make a CA race, that get's the same in about 60 years.
also those negative LRT are to balance the points, I see nothing wrong with for example Low Starting Population as with 12% pop gets grows soon over it.
[Updated on: Mon, 11 December 2006 13:34] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
