Home » Primary Racial Traits » AR » so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
| Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10 |
Fri, 23 February 2007 05:03   |
|
 Carn |
 | Officer Cadet 4th Year |
Messages: 284
Registered: May 2003 | |
|
| Dogthinkers wrote on Fri, 23 February 2007 02:43 |
Mmmm, wrong assumption. ARM is certainly handy, but 50 points to min concs are not needed. They would only really help in situations where you will be dependent on HW mining in early game, but in the case of 3i HE with highly aggressive colonisation the HW will not be producing much more minerals than anywhere else.
|
I've not done the maths, but i 5 kt mining modules make mies cost 10 and need 6 turns to get iron back. The easy researchable 18 kt bot can only be build on HW, as building SBs in lot of places is a huge waste of resources. Therefore main mining early on is done on HW, which then is optimised if a lot of pop stays at HW till 2440 - at least if resources maxed in 2450 is the only parameter relevant.
| Dogthinkers wrote on Fri, 23 February 2007 02:43 |
Also you are overstating the cost of colonisation, - if you mix in some small freighters or coloniser hull boosters then not only you can ship population out a little faster but you can also ship the leftover minerals from colonisation back to the HW.
|
These maths realy get complicated - spending iron in freighters improves pop distribution, but lessens the number of worlds.
In my 12.5K in 2450 testbed i have 102 planets.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
|
so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: wizard on Sun, 15 October 2006 01:52 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Mon, 16 October 2006 02:18 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Kotk on Mon, 16 October 2006 23:30 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Wed, 21 February 2007 08:25 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Thu, 22 February 2007 05:14 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Fri, 23 February 2007 05:03 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Marduk on Fri, 23 February 2007 16:13 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Sat, 24 February 2007 09:25 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Thu, 22 February 2007 02:06 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Thu, 22 February 2007 05:20 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Fri, 23 February 2007 01:55 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Fri, 23 February 2007 04:50 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Sat, 24 February 2007 05:16 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Carn on Sat, 24 February 2007 09:29 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Sat, 24 February 2007 17:18 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: iztok on Mon, 26 February 2007 01:42 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Soobie on Sat, 19 July 2008 22:45 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Soobie on Sun, 20 July 2008 11:07 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
By: Soobie on Mon, 21 July 2008 17:39 |
|
|
Re: so if you go 1/25 instead of 1/10
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon May 06 03:09:10 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
