Re: Regenerating Shield. Advantage or Disadvantage? |
Thu, 27 February 2003 19:26 |
|
Micha | | | Messages: 2342
Registered: November 2002 Location: Belgium GMT +1 | |
|
johng316 wrote on Wed, 26 February 2003 03:23 |
Micha wrote on Sat, 22 February 2003 19:30
Middle game: not putting any armor on my BBs anyway. : | Keeps them gate-able
|
Are you just building beamer BBs then? If you're building missile BBs, you're still not going to be able to gate them (unless you're IT), even without armor.
|
Yup, close to only beamers, only missile for special purposes like shooting down bombers. Works surprisingly well, your enemies showing up with chaff and you not bringing any missiles, what a waste for them!
Still waiting for the moment that somebody thinks: "He's not going to build any missiles at all" and than with all the excess iron I _do_ build missiles and waste my enemies fleet that is unjammed and without chaff.
And I do have plenty of iron laying around! Shortage is bor
Quote: | I don't know about you, but I find that armor per missile ratio is an important part of winning battles.
|
I'm bringing more BBs to the battle, since I can gather them through gates, meaning more firepower.
Quote: | I suppose you could compensate by placing fewer than the maximum number of missiles on your BBs... it would be interesting to test.
|
Can't make a gate-able missile BB, only works with CCs (which are useless missile ships once BBs show up) or omega nubs, and the latter have also very little fire power, more like a special design and not for a main line warship.
Quote: | Another factor in my thinking, I suppose, is that I will never play anything larger than Medium universes, and I strongly prefer Small. This limits the additional value of stargates once the mid-game hits and warp 10 engines arrive on the scene. Still useful, but not nearly as much as when you're playing in large or huge.
|
I also prefer the smaller games, medium is the largest I would play ... although I just finished a _huge_ but that was a teamgame and was fun for once, not to be repeated though ...
regards,
mch
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|