Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » AR » Wide + narrow vs all average habs
Re: Wide + narrow vs all average habs Wed, 04 January 2006 08:59 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Madman is currently offline Madman

 
Officer Cadet 1st Year

Messages: 228
Registered: November 2003
Location: New Zealand
Tomasoid wrote on Thu, 05 January 2006 01:42

Well, and nooooowwwww...
try to account factories. Very Happy


No need to account for factories - it only alters resource output (has no effect on pop growth which is where the non-AR gets hit twice), and is just a linear scaling factor (once built).

Oh, and I should have pointed out in my analysis is not about comparing AR with non-AR - there's too many variables to do that easily - just the effect on reach of reduced hab h - the non-AR ends up with the h^2 on growth.

Quote:

I'll illustrate my question on example:
Let's take 2 one-immune AR races.
Race 1 has narrowest possible temperature, though wide radiation.
Race 2 - is a copy of race 1, but I increase hab range for temperature and equally decrease hab range for radiation, so total number of hab range "clicks" remains the same. Up until temperature and radiation are almost equal. I lose some points here in race wizard by that, so I take normal construction or energy, or even decrease pop growth, sometimes 2 at the same time, to compensate the loss. Now I test. Race 1 is always weaker after 50 years on large/packed/distant/ABBS/NRE game no mater what I choose for race 2 to compensate points losing. Try it out Smile


Well if you are talking about the sum of the clicks remaining the same, the number of habitable planets is proportional the _product_ of clicks, so with the sum the same, the product (hence number of habitable planets) will be higher in race 2. For example 0.2*0.8=0.16, 0.5*0.5=0.25 - same sum of clicks (0.2+0.8=0.5+0.5=1.0), but over 50% more planets.

This gets watered down a bit by the fact that wide+narrow gets much faster initial terraforming (often really fast terraforming if do the narrow first).

A much better way to compare is using the '1 in 4 planets will be habitable' etc. in the race wizard.

As for the _exact_ formula for hab, try: http://constb.5u.com/

although for any sort of analysis, the following (taken from http://www.starsfaq.com/advfaq/guts2.htm ) is likely to be ad
...

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: AR guide
Next Topic: Iperithon's AR
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 26 23:53:07 EDT 2024