Home » Stars! Clones, Extensions, Modding » FreeStars » make PP what they are suppose to be
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be |
Wed, 02 August 2006 09:42 |
|
tgellan | | Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 75
Registered: May 2006 Location: Luxembourg | |
|
Hi,
A change I'd consider, is to completely revisite packets...
Add a new hull type for packets, which can be equipped with a defined number of equipment (weapons?). The hull defines the minimum mass driver required to fling it and the cargo for minerals they can hold. Then treat them as ships, but they need mass drivers to be launched/received. Decomposition due to overflung packages damages the hull in addition to minerals lost... and the hull defines the max. speed the package stands before decomposition start, not the mass driver... There's no engine, nor fuel consumption, colonists die on them instantly, but they could transport (unmanned) ships, so ships can only move again once they arrive on destination. Transport could still load minerals, and interceptors could shoot them down (maybe armorvalue based on loaded minerals?).
Packets would then be similar to bases. Transported ships are stacked to it as sitting ducks too, but their weaponsystems are desactivated!!!
Flinging a package would then cost nothing at all, PP are able to fling a package hull 4x as heavy as any other race using the same mass driver.
These packages would be hurt by mines too , but not stopped, only reducing the hull value, and mineral load... Maybe allow to hit mines more than once on the same turn? Hm Speedtrap mines could actually slow then down
The owner of the planet, the package hull is orbiting becomes also the owner of the package hull and of all it's content, so you may transfer ships with it...
Packet bombing a planet, damages the hull to a certain degree, eventually destroying it. Think about bombing a planet with a packet filled to the brim with Nubians, and the receiver just built an Mass Driver in time or you're waiting for your Nubian reinforcement via Packets, and the Mass Driver gets shot down
And then I'd consider a portable Mass Driver that may be equipped on ships, that do reduce the speed of a package by 1-2 warps. But a package may only be slowed down once per year. Independent of the number of ships or portable Mass Drivers in place. Eventually allow acceleration too? For example, you manage to bring a package to a stop, then you may fling it in space to a new destination...
This has to be fine tuned with stargates of course, but it would be a nice complement to stargates, especially for HE's...
So, what do you think about that one?
Tgellan
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Storm on Tue, 02 August 2005 05:50
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Storm on Tue, 02 August 2005 09:12
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Micha on Tue, 02 August 2005 06:14
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: gible on Tue, 02 August 2005 06:54
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Orca on Tue, 02 August 2005 11:24
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: mazda on Wed, 03 August 2005 04:10
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Wed, 03 August 2005 04:48
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: mazda on Wed, 03 August 2005 05:17
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Wed, 03 August 2005 08:09
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Wed, 03 August 2005 13:02
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Wed, 03 August 2005 13:48
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Wed, 03 August 2005 15:26
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Wed, 03 August 2005 21:07
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: wizard on Fri, 05 August 2005 06:49
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: iztok on Thu, 11 August 2005 04:35
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: mazda on Thu, 11 August 2005 06:14
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: iztok on Thu, 11 August 2005 08:33
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Thu, 11 August 2005 13:00
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: mazda on Thu, 11 August 2005 18:07
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Fri, 12 August 2005 07:20
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Ptolemy on Fri, 12 August 2005 10:21
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: LEit on Sat, 06 August 2005 23:04
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: craebild on Sun, 07 August 2005 04:20
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: LEit on Sun, 07 August 2005 11:02
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: LEit on Mon, 08 August 2005 11:05
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Mon, 08 August 2005 14:23
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Orca on Mon, 08 August 2005 20:05
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Mon, 08 August 2005 21:27
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Mon, 08 August 2005 21:59
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Mon, 08 August 2005 22:10
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Mon, 08 August 2005 22:21
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Mon, 08 August 2005 23:31
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Tue, 09 August 2005 00:01
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Tue, 09 August 2005 00:02
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Tue, 09 August 2005 01:11
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Tue, 09 August 2005 01:36
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Tue, 09 August 2005 01:49
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: mazda on Tue, 09 August 2005 05:57
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: LEit on Tue, 09 August 2005 09:13
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Tue, 09 August 2005 10:59
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: mazda on Tue, 09 August 2005 11:18
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Tue, 09 August 2005 11:26
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: mazda on Tue, 09 August 2005 18:06
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: multilis on Tue, 09 August 2005 20:30
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: gible on Wed, 10 August 2005 05:11
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Ptolemy on Wed, 10 August 2005 23:36
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: gible on Wed, 10 August 2005 23:56
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Ptolemy on Thu, 11 August 2005 00:18
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: iztok on Thu, 11 August 2005 01:52
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Thu, 11 August 2005 02:10
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Ptolemy on Tue, 09 August 2005 13:11
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: dethdukk on Tue, 09 August 2005 01:18
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: crr65536 on Tue, 09 August 2005 01:45
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Ptolemy on Mon, 08 August 2005 09:09
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: donjon on Mon, 08 August 2005 10:58
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: iztok on Thu, 11 August 2005 08:38
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Ptolemy on Mon, 06 February 2006 22:39
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Madman on Mon, 06 February 2006 22:53
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: icebird on Mon, 06 February 2006 23:59
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Madman on Tue, 07 February 2006 05:25
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Micha on Tue, 07 February 2006 05:59
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Madman on Thu, 09 February 2006 06:09
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Tue, 07 February 2006 19:53
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Thu, 09 February 2006 05:24
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Madman on Thu, 09 February 2006 06:30
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Thu, 09 February 2006 12:16
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Madman on Thu, 09 February 2006 16:13
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: tgellan on Wed, 02 August 2006 09:42
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Wed, 02 August 2006 16:27
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: tgellan on Thu, 03 August 2006 04:16
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Kotk on Thu, 03 August 2006 15:32
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: tgellan on Fri, 04 August 2006 03:25
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Nibor on Thu, 03 August 2006 10:41
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Machalot on Fri, 07 September 2007 04:06
|
|
|
Re: make PP what they are suppose to be
By: Coyote on Fri, 07 September 2007 19:56
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon May 06 09:51:03 EDT 2024
|