Home » Primary Racial Traits » HE » -f HE
| Re: -f HE |
Mon, 15 December 2003 04:14   |
|
 timmy |
 | Crewman 1st Class |
Messages: 21
Registered: October 2003 | |
|
[quote title=ccmaster wrote on Mon, 15 December 2003 03:28][quote title=timmy wrote on Mon, 15 December 2003 08:42]| ccmaster wrote on Mon, 15 December 2003 00:41 |
You make one mistake .
In a normal game ( witout BBS ) the HE ( 40 % ) have in year 2406 170k+ grow 56k a year the Joat only 74k on his HW . The Joat needs unitll year 2414 then he have 320k and a grow of 64 k.
So if the HE has Planet around him and send his kolonists away in the time 2406 - 14 lets say only 2 Planets 50 % he wills grow in year with about 112k . This is a "week " example normaly a He have more hen 2 50 % Planets around . Max grow would be if 100% Planets in year 2414 235k . So no Race can beat the grow of a HE ( 40 % ) .
But sure noone plays a 40 % He 
ccmaster
|
You are right that initially, in the first few years of a game, the HE will grow more pop. But my point was that the max pop growth a year achievable is greater for an OBRM Joat than for any other race, including 40% HE. Also, if you want to point to growth attainable in the course of a real game, then I'd expect that an OBRM JoaT would be able to grow more pop by 2410 than your HE (in Acc BBS, which is more common). This because the HE will hit the pop cap too fast and its extremely poor transport ability (low tech, poor freighters) means that it won't be able to ship out the pop fast enough. The JoaT will be able to spread its pop faster, and therefore will grow faster. As the game progresses the JoaT will outbreed the HE more and more. It might take slightly longer to overtake the HE in total pop with Acc BBS off, but it will still happen. All this means the OBRM JoaT breeds better than the 40% HE.
[Updated on: Mon, 15 December 2003 04:15] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
|
-f HE
By: Hyper on Mon, 27 January 2003 18:40 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Hyper on Mon, 27 January 2003 19:35 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Hyper on Mon, 27 January 2003 19:42 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: regiss on Mon, 27 January 2003 21:19 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Hetzer on Fri, 31 January 2003 21:19 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Sotek on Fri, 31 January 2003 23:33 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: zoid on Sat, 01 February 2003 03:52 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: jeffimix on Sat, 01 February 2003 11:34 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Sotek on Sat, 01 February 2003 14:36 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 00:41 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Mon, 15 December 2003 02:42 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 03:28 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Mon, 15 December 2003 04:14 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Soobie on Wed, 27 June 2007 18:09 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: EDog on Thu, 06 November 2003 19:15 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 12:01 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: LEit on Mon, 15 December 2003 12:26 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Mon, 15 December 2003 17:17 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 20:55 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Tue, 16 December 2003 13:10 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: iztok on Wed, 17 December 2003 09:13 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Wed, 17 December 2003 12:47 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Wed, 17 December 2003 15:23 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: LEit on Wed, 17 December 2003 21:20 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: multilis on Fri, 19 December 2003 03:51 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: multilis on Sat, 20 December 2003 00:02 |
|
 |
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: multilis on Thu, 18 December 2003 15:49 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Thu, 18 December 2003 18:24 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 12 07:21:43 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
