Home » Primary Racial Traits » HE » -f HE
| Re: -f HE |
Sat, 01 February 2003 14:36   |
|
 Sotek |
 | Chief Warrant Officer 2 |
Messages: 167
Registered: November 2002 | |
|
No, no, I'm not talking about a testbed race by any means. I'm talking about actual races in actual games. No, they're not HE, but they /are/ -f.
In one game, I've got gigantic stocks of all minerals that I can't use up as fast as I continue to mine, and my mine settings are, I kid you not, 11/3/7. Now, that's an IT, but it certainly works.
10/3/12 is what I've got for another race: This one SS, and which just threw packets big enough to kill several worlds with maximal defenses, and hasn't used the robber baron yet...
...and still has enough minerals on the ground to build lots and lots of ships.
10/4/7 is certainly extreme, but it'd also be playable; I've done it.
Now, I just made an HE... compare this one to the previous one:
NRSE, OBRM, ISB, TT. Reasonable LRTs, although I'd tend to want to take NAS as well.
Hab: All bars full width, then in one.
PGR: 12% (the NAS version can go up to 13%.)
Econ:
Pop: 1/1000 efficiency, the only setting worth the cost.
Factories: 5/25/5, no g box. Standard -f.
Mines: 10/3/13 (NAS version might drop to 10/3/12 for that extra point or two to get the 13% PGR.)
Tech: Weap, Const, Bio cheap and Ener, Elect, Prop expensive.
Obviously you can toy with those (I might want ener and bio both std, but that's a non-certain thing.) but they're the same settings as Freakyboy proposed, more or less.
The minerals won't be a problem, and the extra growth will /really/ help.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
 |
|
-f HE
By: Hyper on Mon, 27 January 2003 18:40 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Hyper on Mon, 27 January 2003 19:35 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Hyper on Mon, 27 January 2003 19:42 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: regiss on Mon, 27 January 2003 21:19 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Hetzer on Fri, 31 January 2003 21:19 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Sotek on Fri, 31 January 2003 23:33 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: zoid on Sat, 01 February 2003 03:52 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: jeffimix on Sat, 01 February 2003 11:34 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Sotek on Sat, 01 February 2003 14:36 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 00:41 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Mon, 15 December 2003 02:42 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 03:28 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Mon, 15 December 2003 04:14 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: Soobie on Wed, 27 June 2007 18:09 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: EDog on Thu, 06 November 2003 19:15 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 12:01 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: LEit on Mon, 15 December 2003 12:26 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Mon, 15 December 2003 17:17 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Mon, 15 December 2003 20:55 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Tue, 16 December 2003 13:10 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: iztok on Wed, 17 December 2003 09:13 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: timmy on Wed, 17 December 2003 12:47 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Wed, 17 December 2003 15:23 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: LEit on Wed, 17 December 2003 21:20 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: multilis on Fri, 19 December 2003 03:51 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: multilis on Sat, 20 December 2003 00:02 |
|
 |
Re: -f HE
|
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: multilis on Thu, 18 December 2003 15:49 |
|
|
Re: -f HE
By: ccmaster on Thu, 18 December 2003 18:24 |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat May 11 08:09:43 EDT 2024
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
