Home » Primary Racial Traits » IS » IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets? |
Sun, 11 February 2007 20:08 |
|
|
And that is pretty much exactly what I did. Though, I think the hab range was a 1 in 5 close to 1 in 6. Kotk is correct - resources for reds were something like 275 - "around 300". Resources at 2450 were 31k if I remember correct though, I didn't use LF's to keep them populated, I used privateers. I had plenty enough built to do so. It also meant needing to keep less minerals in the ships to keep the pop at a 'just' negative growth of like 100 per year with the planet overpopulated by 200%. Every few years I'd take a run around the planets and adjust the pop back up to the full 200% overpop. With a few of the reds producing a slight surplus from the orbital pop, I had a couple privateers making rounds and picking up excessses.
The main enemy did indeed pop drop on several of the farther reds when they only had 65-100k on them - his pop losses were tremendous.
Ptolemy
Though we often ask how and why, we must also do to get the answers to the questions.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Wreck on Sat, 14 May 2005 20:25
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: iztok on Sun, 15 May 2005 05:09
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Robert on Wed, 18 May 2005 11:54
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Kotk on Fri, 27 May 2005 10:30
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Wreck on Sat, 28 May 2005 22:51
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Kotk on Sun, 29 May 2005 04:29
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: mazda on Fri, 27 May 2005 05:44
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: LEit on Mon, 13 June 2005 12:10
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: tgellan on Mon, 22 January 2007 12:34
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Ptolemy on Mon, 22 January 2007 15:10
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Kotk on Sun, 11 February 2007 18:45
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Ptolemy on Sun, 11 February 2007 20:08
|
|
|
Re: IS pop -over pop planets, or build red planets?
By: Marduk on Sat, 15 November 2008 02:52
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 05 12:42:29 EDT 2024
|