Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » NAS or no-NAS late game? (split from New Game Idea: Chrysalis)
NAS or no-NAS late game? (split from New Game Idea: Chrysalis) Wed, 27 April 2005 17:07 Go to previous message
iztok is currently offline iztok

 
Commander

Messages: 1209
Registered: April 2003
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Hi!
Kotk wrote on Wed, 27 April 2005 17:07

... NAS starts to be quite serious disadvantage to not-JOATs later ...

That's what I'd like to discuss Deal . It is nice to spy on your neighbour's orbits Cool , but it isn't nice to have max possible detection range to an 98% cloaked fleet only 2% of 1224 LY (Nub with full Peerless) or 24 LY Shocked . Knowing my opponent has pen-scanners I'd produce more overcloakers and play accordingly Sneaky . I'd also need to cloak my fleets in orbits only to about 90% to make them invisible to him most of the time, thus making his every attack even bigger gamble it is usually Furious . Besides, pen scanners can be bought Yes , double scan range can be not No (if there's no IS OFC Wink ).
Comments please?
BR, Iztok


[Updated on: Wed, 27 April 2005 17:18]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: What good is PPS?
Next Topic: Bombing Bug
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 18 13:40:52 EDT 2024