Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Bar » What do players think?
What do players think? Sat, 15 January 2005 11:37 Go to previous message
Steve1

 
Officer Cadet 2nd Year

Messages: 240
Registered: January 2003
Location: Australia

What do players think?[ 42 votes ]
1. The situation is unfair and the host should ban the players! 1 / 2%
2. The players are well within their rights to not attack each other. 7 / 17%
3. This situation would spoil the game. 11 / 26%
4. They should be forced to attack each other or no winner can be declared. 3 / 7%
5. I've seen this happen in a couple of games and it's annoying. 4 / 10%
6. I've seen this happen in a couple of games and I'm okay with it. 1 / 2%
7. I've seen this happen in a couple of games and I think it's par for the course. 2 / 5%
8. I've seen this happen in lots of games and it's annoying. 2 / 5%
9. I've seen this happen in lots of games and I'm okay with it. 0 / 0%
10. I've seen this happen in lots of games and I think it's par for the course. 2 / 5%
11. I've done myself this a couple of times. 1 / 2%
12. I do this in many games I play. 1 / 2%
13. If I was in their position I wouldn't attack either. 2 / 5%
14. I regard this practice as cheating. 1 / 2%
15. What are you whining about, just get on with the game. 3 / 7%
16. Other. Please be specific in your posting. 1 / 2%
17. I'd never do this and players that do are scumbags! 0 / 0%

We have a situation in a current game whereby the top two races are allied and have no intention of attacking each other. Shocked
Alliances are allowed but it's a "one winner only" game (refer last paragraph of this posting) and I'd be interested to know if other players have experienced this situation before.

The races are saying that they've been allied from the start and shared tech, ship designs, fully intercolonised, etc. and therefore have built a good relationship and are unable to war with each other.
The second placed player realises by taking this course of action that he can't win unless his economy is improved substantially or the #1 player takes a bit of a beating from the rest of the universe, but says that he's happy to be part of the leading alliance. Confused

They also state that they probably wouldn't be in the #1 and #2 positions if they hadn't assisted each other to such a degree, which may well be true. Trophy

It seems their intention is to wait until a vote is called or wipe out the rest of the races until it's only them left, but even then to not go to war with each other. Cheers

If you could vote and give feedback that would great.
I'd like to hear both perspectives, so feel free to share your opinions. Yes No


Update: One of the players pointed out that my wording wasn't quite correct and rather than calling it a "One winner game", I should have said "Last man standing game".
Seems the same to me (perhaps a subtle difference), but has been included for arguments sake Smile







[Updated on: Sat, 15 January 2005 12:54]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon10.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Are u obsessed with SAH?
Next Topic: In-Game Messaging
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 29 11:37:07 EDT 2024