Re: Should we create and use a system for ranking players? |
Mon, 29 March 2004 19:12 |
|
Crusader | | Officer Cadet 2nd Year | Messages: 233
Registered: January 2003 Location: Dixie Land | |
|
Player support, I believe, says it all very eloquently. No matter how everything else pans out, we are all such an independently thinking bunch of ne'er-do-wells that support will only come about so long as we are each having fun.
If it becomes too much hassle ...
Unfortunately, I don't see too many people willing to be "ranking hosts", which is going to put a crimp on things as well. I haven't read any clear directions on how the rankings will be determined in a clear and consistent manner, unless I've missed something on that thread. And it is obvious that the majority want a clear and consistent ranking system in place before the games begin. Having the host make subjective decisions at games end is just not a popular idea, if I'm reading these results correctly.
Understanding that my own opinion could well be coloring my interpretations.
But, whatever else this idea has done, it has sparked more interest than anything else in quite a while. For that reason alone, I support the public discussion of this idea for as long as it takes. I am willing to play in a ranking game for this reason. I'm willing to put up with a lot in order to promote Stars!
Including being called "tiger".
The Crusader
Nothing for now.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|