Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » CA » CA Balance
Re: CA Balance Sun, 03 July 2011 13:50 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Void is currently offline Void

 
Ensign

Messages: 369
Registered: January 2011
Location: California, GMT -7
magic9mushroom wrote on Sun, 03 July 2011 03:11

Would a requirement of two immunities balance CA? It's the simplest requirement I can think of, and does remove most of their instaforming.

It may be overdoing it.

From the RW standpoint, I took a normal -f CA that I would consider for duels, made gravity and temperature immune, and minimized and right shifted radiation. I was left with this race design:

CA
IFE, NRSE, ISB, OBRM, NAS, RS
I/I/80-100mR
1 in 5, 19%
5/25/5/4
10/3/13
Weapons, Const cheap
Rest expensive, Start @4 checked

...and -317 RW points left.

To get to zero I have to drop Const cheap and make it expensive, drop mines operated to 12, drop ISB, and drop RS.

Actually, I suppose that's not exactly neutered, although it would be a pain to play. I don't see any way to have a +F design, though. On the plus side about 20% of the planets would be 100% for them in short order!

As I play around with the RW, I think a 180 point penalty is too conservative. 250-300 might be more like it.

What would be interesting would be for two equally skilled players to actually play a handicapped CA against a traditional IT duel race design, for example, and see where it did well (and did poorly).

Cheers,
Void


Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon5.gif
Read Message
Read Message icon3.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Was CA balanced under 2.5?
Next Topic: Lowest possible growth rate
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed May 15 21:41:06 EDT 2024