Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » CA » CA Balance
Re: CA Balance Fri, 09 June 2006 02:20 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
iztok is currently offline iztok

 
Commander

Messages: 1207
Registered: April 2003
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Hi!
Tomasoid wrote on Thu, 08 June 2006 09:38

> So don't say there's no advantage from better Energy and Elec.

Sure. But that's temporary. Cheaper Weapons and Construction techs beat that all in 10-15 turns later.

Laughing Laughing Laughing Give me just five turns of such an advantage and I'll mount on you such a nasty attack your empire will never recover. Twisted Evil
Let's say we start somewhat even in warships and planets. In five turns I would go fully for my jammed BBs that would have first shoot and would kill your unjammed BBs in 2 to 1 ratio. In those five turns I'd get 50% more BBs and would have them at the front to mount an attack. You'd have just two choices, neither of them good.
- If you'd stand and fight you'd lose all your fleet, and I'd remain with most new ships, probably also with quite some older ones. With such a supremacy on my side you'd soon start losing planets.
- If you'd retreat your "outdated" ships you'd start losing planets sooner, and with that also losing your ability to research better tech to counter my ships, and ability to actually build them when you'd get that desired tech(s).
To make things even worse for you, I would in that time also research better tech, and while you'd be struggling to build your ships to counter mine, I'd be quite likely producing ships that would again make your new ships obsolete. Also, you'd be producing those inferior ships with already reduced economy, while mine would be at least the same, allowing me to cripple you even more and with less costs.

All this "spiral of death" Shocked just because I had "a temporary 5 turns tech advantage". Wink Laughing

BR, Iztok
...



[Updated on: Fri, 09 June 2006 02:54]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon5.gif
Read Message
Read Message icon3.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Was CA balanced under 2.5?
Next Topic: Lowest possible growth rate
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 14 20:43:09 EDT 2024