Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » CA » CA Balance
Re: CA Balance Thu, 08 June 2006 03:38 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Tomasoid is currently offline Tomasoid

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 182
Registered: December 2005
Location: Ukraine

Hi!

iztok wrote on Thu, 08 June 2006 09:34


Quote:

SS problem (currently playing it in one of the games) is that Energy and Electric techs give very little for its economy and weapons strength.

Erm... being first to have jammed jihad BBs with SuperComp doubles the survival rate and gives you first shoot over 7-comp BB. Having Gorilla (or Bear) shields over Bear (Wolverine) makes your ships much more resistant to anything. 've been or receiving end against high-elec player: my jugg BBs with 4 SuperComp & 3 jammer-20 were next to useless (20% accuracy) to opponent's 4 jammer-30 & 3 Nexus (50% accuracy). So don't say there's no advantage from better Energy and Elec.



Sure. But that's temporary. Cheaper Weapons and Construction techs beat that all in 10-15 turns later. Is not that is why everybody tries to have chap Weapons and construction as soon as possible? Also, you mentioned BBs. When you select enery and electro techs cheap (to try to reach robber baroon quickly), you probably would not be able to have cheap Construction. If select, you end with por economy.

Quote:


Quote:

So selecting Energy and Electro techs cheaper by SS should cost less RW points, IMO.

As about SD, make NAS gives less RW points for it as well.

There's the question about feasibility. My proposals can be done. Can you do that, what you propose? Wink



Laughing Yes, there is such a question. Smile But it is worth a try. Starting techs for races probably could be easy to change if they stored in executable for each PRT separately as values. As about particular RW option costs...

This might be good for FreeStars clone, BTW.
...




WBR, Vlad

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon5.gif
Read Message
Read Message icon3.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Was CA balanced under 2.5?
Next Topic: Lowest possible growth rate
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 14 20:10:29 EDT 2024