Home World Forum: CA » CA Balance

Home » Primary Racial Traits » CA » CA Balance

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: CA Balance

Tue, 06 June 2006 13:23

iztok

Commander

Messages: 1207
Registered: April 2003
Location: Slovenia, Europe

Hi!

Tomasoid wrote on Tue, 06 June 2006 14:36

IMO, IT race needs LESS points, or, at least make -f IT not that powerful at the early game and late game

I agree in early game IT is very strong, because it can gate around pop and minerals, thus making it very fast. But that's about the only thing it has, besides being expensive. When nubians come around (late game), they lose lots of their advantage, as everybody can gate missile ships. Besides, 1/800 people resources is hideous expensive for what is offers. IMO not many experienced players would pick that. For a -f is IMO more important to have excellent tech and good hab. 1/800 can't afford any.

Quote:

PP IS POWER, if have something for better startup. If you launch a game with 50 year startup with only factories/mines built on starting HW, PP wins all other races

That's exactly the reason why in most forced-gen games (or games with very small amount of planets) packets are forbiden, or severely limited. I wanted to give PPs more minerals, because for everythign what they can do, they need minerals, and at the end they don't have them enough for ships.

Quote:

AR - do you know how powerful AR can be at the later game?

I do. But they need to survive early game. Wink

Quote:

Instead of adding RW points, I would give ... AR starting Construction 7 and Electronics 4 for better mining robots right from start.

That's IMO one solution to avoid early mineral crunch that makes ARs so vulnerable in early game. Hovewer in previous notes there was not mention of changing starting tech.

Quote:

you propose to make difference between SD and SS as much as 91 RW points!!! But SD is not that much more powerful than SS, specially in economy. And SS plays much better against SD minefields than others. Why SUCH big difference then???

SD is MUCH stronger in economy than SS - just the difference in starting RW points is 87. And SD gets additional 105 ponts by taking NAS, while SS gets only 40. Now convert those ~150 points in econ and/or hab and check what you get. Besides, h ...

[ Show the rest of the message ]

[Updated on: Tue, 06 June 2006 13:28]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		CA Balance By: boneandrew on Wed, 10 December 2003 12:55
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Wed, 10 December 2003 15:26
		Re: CA Balance By: LEit on Wed, 10 December 2003 16:14
		Re: CA Balance By: boneandrew on Wed, 10 December 2003 18:14
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Wed, 10 December 2003 20:32
		Re: CA Balance By: multilis on Thu, 01 April 2004 15:18
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Thu, 01 April 2004 20:31
		Re: CA Balance By: multilis on Fri, 02 April 2004 00:40
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Fri, 02 April 2004 00:48
		Re: CA Balance By: multilis on Fri, 02 April 2004 10:35
		Re: CA Balance By: LEit on Fri, 02 April 2004 11:22
		Re: CA Balance By: Steve1 on Fri, 02 April 2004 12:20
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Fri, 11 February 2005 19:52
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Fri, 11 February 2005 20:14
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Fri, 11 February 2005 20:29
		Re: CA Balance By: Steve1 on Fri, 11 February 2005 22:53
		Re: CA Balance By: schonhult on Thu, 11 December 2003 07:13
		Re: CA Balance By: bigdave on Wed, 24 December 2003 06:10
		Re: CA Balance By: Steve1 on Wed, 24 December 2003 08:11
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Wed, 24 December 2003 08:34
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Wed, 24 December 2003 18:34
		Re: CA Balance By: Orca on Tue, 06 January 2004 17:33
		Re: CA Balance By: The Taubat on Thu, 25 December 2003 19:40
		Re: CA Balance By: Steve1 on Mon, 05 January 2004 11:37
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Mon, 05 January 2004 21:20
		Re: CA Balance By: mlaub on Mon, 05 January 2004 22:28
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Tue, 06 January 2004 00:28
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Tue, 06 January 2004 02:01
		Re: CA Balance By: mlaub on Tue, 06 January 2004 11:03
		Re: CA Balance By: joseph on Tue, 06 January 2004 11:31
		Re: CA Balance By: Sinla on Tue, 06 January 2004 15:07
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Tue, 06 January 2004 15:07
		Re: CA Balance By: gible on Tue, 06 January 2004 17:39
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Tue, 06 January 2004 22:07
		Re: CA Balance By: LEit on Tue, 06 January 2004 22:12
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Tue, 06 January 2004 22:21
		Re: CA Balance By: LEit on Wed, 07 January 2004 12:21
		Re: CA Balance By: mlaub on Tue, 06 January 2004 22:44
		Re: CA Balance By: xdude on Wed, 07 January 2004 06:11
		Re: CA Balance By: nmid on Thu, 17 February 2011 13:53
		Re: CA Balance By: magic9mushroom on Fri, 18 February 2011 03:13
		Re: CA Balance By: nmid on Fri, 18 February 2011 09:12
		Re: CA Balance By: EDog on Thu, 08 January 2004 12:11
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Tue, 13 January 2004 23:20
		Re: CA Balance By: timmy on Wed, 14 January 2004 02:29
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Wed, 14 January 2004 02:43
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Wed, 14 January 2004 23:15
		Re: CA Balance By: timmy on Thu, 15 January 2004 01:01
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Thu, 15 January 2004 23:04
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Fri, 16 January 2004 00:03
		Re: CA Balance By: mlaub on Fri, 16 January 2004 12:51
		Re: CA Balance By: Micha on Fri, 16 January 2004 13:35
		Re: CA Balance By: mlaub on Fri, 16 January 2004 15:14
		Re: CA Balance By: alexdstewart on Fri, 16 January 2004 21:58
		Re: CA Balance By: Steve1 on Sat, 17 January 2004 07:02
		Re: CA Balance By: multilis on Thu, 01 April 2004 15:08
		Re: CA Balance By: Sotek on Thu, 01 April 2004 20:36
		Re: CA Balance By: mlaub on Tue, 06 January 2004 16:57
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Fri, 11 February 2005 23:34
		Re: CA Balance By: Steve1 on Sat, 12 February 2005 00:04
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Sat, 12 February 2005 00:43
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Sat, 12 February 2005 03:49
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Sat, 12 February 2005 16:02
		Re: CA Balance By: Dogthinkers on Mon, 14 February 2005 21:27
		Re: CA Balance By: crr65536 on Sat, 16 July 2005 19:10
		Re: CA Balance By: gible on Sat, 16 July 2005 20:03
		Re: CA Balance By: crr65536 on Sat, 16 July 2005 22:14
		Re: CA Balance By: Braindead on Sun, 17 July 2005 04:05
		Re: CA Balance By: m.a@stars on Sun, 17 July 2005 05:52
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Sun, 17 July 2005 08:59
		Re: CA Balance By: crr65536 on Sun, 17 July 2005 10:34
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Mon, 18 July 2005 06:23
		Re: CA Balance By: vonKreedon on Mon, 18 July 2005 13:04
		Re: CA Balance By: PricklyPea on Mon, 18 July 2005 13:35
		Re: CA Balance By: vonKreedon on Tue, 19 July 2005 10:25
		Re: CA Balance By: crr65536 on Tue, 19 July 2005 10:53
		Re: CA Balance By: Tomasoid on Tue, 06 June 2006 08:36
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Tue, 06 June 2006 13:23
		Re: CA Balance By: Tomasoid on Tue, 06 June 2006 13:54
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Wed, 07 June 2006 02:22
		Re: CA Balance By: Tomasoid on Wed, 07 June 2006 05:46
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Thu, 08 June 2006 02:34
		Re: CA Balance By: Tomasoid on Thu, 08 June 2006 03:38
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Fri, 09 June 2006 02:20
		Re: CA Balance By: Tomasoid on Fri, 09 June 2006 08:20
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Fri, 09 June 2006 08:56
		Re: CA Balance By: Tomasoid on Fri, 09 June 2006 09:12
		Re: CA Balance By: Micha on Fri, 09 June 2006 10:22
		Re: CA Balance By: tgellan on Tue, 13 June 2006 05:45
		Re: CA Balance By: Tomasoid on Tue, 13 June 2006 08:37
		Re: CA Balance By: shiver on Fri, 13 January 2006 14:23
		Re: CA Balance By: Micha on Sun, 15 January 2006 05:33
		Re: CA Balance By: magic9mushroom on Sun, 03 July 2011 06:11
		Re: CA Balance By: Void on Sun, 03 July 2011 13:50
		Re: CA Balance By: magic9mushroom on Mon, 04 July 2011 05:47
		Re: CA Balance By: nmid on Mon, 04 July 2011 06:12
		Re: CA Balance By: magic9mushroom on Mon, 04 July 2011 06:21
		Re: CA Balance By: Void on Mon, 04 July 2011 11:35
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Mon, 04 July 2011 14:40
		Re: CA Balance By: nmid on Mon, 04 July 2011 16:52
		Re: CA Balance By: Void on Mon, 04 July 2011 20:53
		Re: CA Balance By: nmid on Mon, 04 July 2011 21:10
		Re: CA Balance By: Void on Mon, 04 July 2011 22:32
		Re: CA Balance By: magic9mushroom on Tue, 05 July 2011 04:54
		Re: CA Balance By: iztok on Tue, 05 July 2011 07:15
		Re: CA Balance By: nmid on Tue, 05 July 2011 07:17
		Re: CA Balance By: magic9mushroom on Wed, 06 July 2011 07:05

Previous Topic:	Was CA balanced under 2.5?
Next Topic:	Lowest possible growth rate

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Wed May 15 03:44:08 EDT 2024