Home » Primary Racial Traits » HE » HE race. Thoughts?
HE race. Thoughts? |
Mon, 29 December 2008 04:20 |
|
magic9mushroom | | Commander | Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
HE
ISB, OBRM, RS
3i, 6%
1/1000
12/8/17
11/3/18
Weapons, Construction, Propulsion cheap, Energy normal.
I'm too lazy to do a full testbed, but from a to 2420 testbed, a few things are obvious: The Germ crunch exists but is manageable thanks to the good mines, packed density is near-essential for good growth, and factories/mines lag quite a bit, so homeworld building of most ships is essential.
Thoughts?
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: HE race. Thoughts? |
Mon, 29 December 2008 05:56 |
|
iztok | | Commander | Messages: 1206
Registered: April 2003 Location: Slovenia, Europe | |
|
Hi!
magic9mushroom wrote on Mon, 29 December 2008 10:20 | Thoughts?
|
Umm, I miss 59 RW points. Did you take 3g cost for factories? If you did, you can easily change it for better mine or factory efficiency. With 935 factories per 100% planet you can afford paying 4g for a factory. Anyway, here's what I'd do.
Take NRSE and prop at least normal if not expensive. You don't want to research prop up to 16 just for warp-10 engine. With this you'd also get enough points for mines eff +1.
Get more mines, like 10/3/23. With your settings you'll be operating only 900 mines per 100% full planet (450 at 50% hold). When sh.t hits the fan you'll not have enough minerals for serious shipbuilding.
Quote: | Weapons, Construction, Propulsion cheap, Energy normal
|
Take En cheap for better shields and defenses. Take Prop expensive: the most you'll ever need is prop-12. Take Elec normal for more reasons:
- you have pen scanners, whose you can trade.
- Obtaining Super comp and jammer-20/30 faster than others gives good advantage.
- Not to mention you have that nasty Flux capacitor at elec-14.
Just a last thought: PGR 6% makes your race quite fast, so it is IMO more suitable for crowded games than for longer-lasting games. The race should work well in any uni density, but OFC the densier the stars the faster it will grow (less lost growth in transit).
BR, Iztok
[Updated on: Mon, 29 December 2008 06:32] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: HE race. Thoughts? |
Tue, 30 December 2008 07:42 |
|
magic9mushroom | | Commander | Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
iztok wrote on Mon, 29 December 2008 21:56 | Hi!
magic9mushroom wrote on Mon, 29 December 2008 10:20 | Thoughts?
|
Umm, I miss 59 RW points. Did you take 3g cost for factories? If you did, you can easily change it for better mine or factory efficiency. With 935 factories per 100% planet you can afford paying 4g for a factory.
|
Yes, 3g facts. I came close to crunching as-is. Remember that although I have 1/2 pop/planet, I have more than 2x planets/unit space because of triimm.
Quote: | Take NRSE and prop at least normal if not expensive. You don't want to research prop up to 16 just for warp-10 engine. With this you'd also get enough points for mines eff +1.
|
Yeah, I'd thought about it. I hate NRSE, that's all, and would prefer the battle efficiency, 'specially since HEs rely more on cruiser-class hulls than any other (factoried) race. And I would get 1 less than the amount of points for mine eff +1
Quote: |
Get more mines, like 10/3/23. With your settings you'll be operating only 900 mines per 100% full planet (450 at 50% hold). When sh.t hits the fan you'll not have enough minerals for serious shipbuilding.
|
But won't I have twice as many planets to mine on?
Quote: |
Quote: | Weapons, Construction, Propulsion cheap, Energy normal
|
Take En cheap for better shields and defenses. Take Prop expensive: the most you'll ever need is prop-12. Take Elec normal for more reasons:
- you have pen scanners, whose you can trade.
- Obtaining Super comp and jammer-20/30 faster than others gives good advantage.
- Not to mention you have that nasty Flux capacitor at elec-14.
|
The Flux Cap's at Ener 14, Elec 7. Besides that, you have a point. A question though: Would elec cheap, ener normal be a valid option? What about taking only 2 cheap techs?
Quote: | Just a last thought: PGR 6% makes your race quite fast, so it is IMO more suitable for crowded games than for longer-lasting games. The race should work well in any uni density, but OFC the densier the stars the faster it will grow (less lost growth in transit).
BR, Iztok
|
I know what you mean about good in small unis, but why wouldn't it be effective in longer games?
So, revised race:
HE
ISB, NRSE, OBRM, RS
3i, 6%
12/8/18/3g
11/3/20
WCN cheap L normal PB expensive
Another question, why are 3i HEs considered crap?
Report message to a moderator
|
|
| |
Re: HE race. Thoughts? |
Tue, 30 December 2008 20:59 |
|
Xardre | | Master Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 100
Registered: June 2005 | |
|
HE are considered garbage because of the 40+ years need to ramp up and the lack of stargates. But if you realy want to try one heres one from my race book. Dont have the testbed numbers anymore and have never used this in a game but you might have a use for it.
HE (of course)
TT, ISB, OBRM, NAS
Grav Immune, Temp -120 to 120, Rad 30 to 70
7% (14%) growth, 1in4 (eventualy all)
1/1000
15/7/25/3G
11/3/24
3.5 tech (weapons/con cheap, prop exspensive rest normal)
And before you ask why take TT on an HE race, i took it for the ramp time. 30% discount on terra is huge when your 50% hold on a world only produces just over 1300 resources for a perfect world.
Diplomacy, Find a 1in10 race and inter settle fast, dishout all tech you can to keep out of a war as you are kind of exsposed without gates till metamorph swarms can be built. IT, SD and IS are your best allies for the minelayers and gates.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: HE race. Thoughts? |
Wed, 31 December 2008 03:15 |
|
magic9mushroom | | Commander | Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
Both of your responses are full of holes.
@EW: You DON'T have to spread out over more territory. That's exactly the point. Tri-imm more than makes up for half planet size in res/space. Hence you have a more compact empire, not more spread out. Unless you grow more and take other people's space, which isn't exactly bad.
@Xardre: But you DON'T need 40+ years to ramp up. Play this and tell me it's slow:
HE
ISB, NRSE, OBRM, NAS, RS
3i, 6%
1/1000
13/8/20/3g
13/3/18
Weap, con cheap
That's what you get if you go for pure econ. Even that's not as harsh on tech and LRTs as your average HG, but will almost certainly breach 40k if not 50k by 2450. Plus you can intersettle with anyone and can trade con tech and minerals for planets and gate use.
Also, your race has a couple of problems. Foremost in my mind is your crap growth. Triimmunes can get away easily with low growth because everything's 100%. Biimmunes can, too, to a lesser extent, because their average lived-on hab is something ridiculous like 80-85%. But a one-immune won't do much better than 60% average hab, so you'll be lucky to get 9% achieved growth, which dumps you well under the HG races. Also, your mines suck compared to your factories, which will prevent you from building much with all those wonderful resources, and last, prop expensive with no NRSE hurts. A lot.
I will admit that your average HG TT CA will eat, swallow, digest, and poop out most 3i HEs, but... that's an HG TT CA.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: HE race. Thoughts? |
Wed, 31 December 2008 07:32 |
|
iztok | | Commander | Messages: 1206
Registered: April 2003 Location: Slovenia, Europe | |
|
Hi!
magic9mushroom wrote on Tue, 30 December 2008 13:42 | I hate NRSE, that's all, and would prefer the battle efficiency
|
Last time I checked all "standard" engines were faster in battle than comparable scoop engines. Regarding fuel: your race can build the refueling Dock in one turn on every empty (== bombed out ) planet in a single turn.
Quote: | 'specially since HEs rely more on cruiser-class hulls than any other (factoried) race.
|
Umm, in MY book of Stars!-rules-of-thumb there's no such a statement . I'd use hordes of CCs if I'd have gates, to "throw" them around as needed. But for a HE with NRSE is the AD-8 engine the last I'd put on a mainline warship CC. TGD-9 and IS-10 are simply too expensive to be used en-mass on a CC. And the AD-8 on a CC has a nasty limitation of just one W-9 move. There's no fuel for the next one, so a player has to do more MM to overcome that limitation.
Quote: | > Get more mines, like 10/3/23.
But won't I have twice as many planets to mine on?
|
Yes, but you'll also have twice as many planets to build on them. Those planets will ALL have about 1.5k resources, and the 16-Jihad BB costs about 1k resurces but 1.3MT of iron. With ~1k mines operating you could VERY soon have resources, but no minerals. Belive me, two years ago I've won a game Star-Crossed with a 6% 3-immune HE with 10/3/21 mines, and I had to be quite picky about what to build.
Quote: | Would elec cheap, ener normal be a valid option?
|
IMO not. The last tech for Elec you want to get in a "normaly" fast game is level 16 for jammer-30 and Elephant pen scanners. Then there's quite a big "hole" to Nexus comp at Elec-19, and nothing more of real importance thereafter. But in Energy you have two shields at en-18 and 22 and ultimate defenses at en-23. IMO for a HE with its half-sized planets better defenses come handy.
Quote: | What about taking only 2 cheap techs?
|
An option, but the 3rd cheap tech is quite cheap in RW points, and could save you a lot of resources (and time) you
...
[Updated on: Thu, 01 January 2009 05:54] Report message to a moderator
|
|
| | |
Re: HE race. Thoughts? |
Fri, 02 January 2009 05:39 |
|
|
Hi ,
most times it depends on the gamesettings and special the players next to you .
You can not say a 7% is a nasty HG race and need no dip. .
Normaly the best way to play HE is to go for the exta speed they have and not to go for max Res. / planet .
There are other races around could do this more easy. So if you want play a HE use the advantages of the Race not try to beat the other races in some Point.
ccmaster
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu May 02 17:36:37 EDT 2024
|