| What do you mean ...2vs2 |
Wed, 10 December 2008 19:04  |
|
|
|
Hi all out there ,
what do you mean ?
Want to start a game " Team Game 2vs2 " could find it in the ne games section and looking for the best settings and your meaning about it.
Should be a team game 2 vs 2 in a small univers what do you think about ....
... dense
... victory conditions
... races banned
... races left over points or other restrictions.
Hope there are some still out there 
ccmaster
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: What do you mean ...2vs2 |
Wed, 10 December 2008 19:30  |
|
|
|
I'm not playing, but my suggestion would be a tiny packed universe and all four PRTs must be different.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: What do you mean ...2vs2 |
Wed, 10 December 2008 20:15 |
|
 swp1 |
 | Petty Officer 1st Class |
Messages: 68
Registered: February 2008
Location: outside Philadelphia, PA | |
|
I won't be playing, but I would suggest different PRTs and banning IT, JoaT, CA, and IS. Or better yet, let your opponents design your races for you. and vice versa.
tiny, packed, last team standing, AdvBBS, yes random events, near starting positions. just a thought. you've already played the other kinds of games, give this a try.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What do you mean ...2vs2 |
Wed, 10 December 2008 20:27 |
|
|
|
For race restrictions, it'd be fine IMO to have JoaT not allowed to have NAS, and CA forced to take BET. IT and IS have no special advantages in a tiny (IT's actually weaker). PP and SD, now, would be ones to watch out for. You might want to ban PP since close starting positions mean they can find your homeworld and bombard it very early. Alternatively, you could just rule that packets can't be thrown at inhabited worlds before 2450 - so PP could still scout and packetform, but not slam someone at 2405 and kill half their pop.
Distant starting positions would be a wise choice, it usually is regardless of anything else.
[Updated on: Wed, 10 December 2008 20:31] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What do you mean ...2vs2 |
Thu, 11 December 2008 12:43 |
|
|
|
Hi ,
the races build for the enemie team sounds nice , but i think there we have to make some rules for it waht do you think ?
Main have to e to spent all points in the race wizard.
ccmaster
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: What do you mean ...2vs2 |
Thu, 11 December 2008 13:10 |
|
| Orange |
 | Officer Cadet 1st Year |
Messages: 215
Registered: November 2005
Location: TO, ONT, CA | |
|
| ccmaster wrote on Thu, 11 December 2008 12:43 |
Hi ,
the races build for the enemie team sounds nice , but i think there we have to make some rules for it waht do you think ?
Main have to e to spent all points in the race wizard.
ccmaster
|
Very interesting - an exercise on how to build the baddest designs ever.
Since the starting positions will greatly influence the designs and game, you should specify if the universe will be modified to move the races together or not.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What do you mean ...2vs2 |
Tue, 16 December 2008 21:50 |
|
|
|
| swp1 wrote on Tue, 16 December 2008 21:34 |
...small dense galaxy against 15 AIs where that 'crappy' race is shown to have clearly conquered the galaxy or wiped out all opposition.
|
Whah.... I don't think you could design a race where one would not *eventually* win against the AIs... But what a pile of work...
not very interesting. I tested primitive designs against the AIs, and it was not even a fight... but it was a chore...
race design (and team race design here in particular) is one of the potentially most satisfying parts of playing this game. Why take that away again?
naz
[Updated on: Tue, 16 December 2008 21:51] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
