Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » -f explained
-f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 04:48 Go to next message
beanspoon is currently offline beanspoon

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 182
Registered: June 2008
I understand that a race defined as "-f", means that they are "factoryless," but having been through the race designer a couple of times, a cannot find how to make a race factoryless - is it just that you put the resources needed to build a factory and the colonists needed to maintain it up as high as possible (getting you lots of AP) and then put up the number of resources produced by 1000 colonists as high as it will go?

Am I close?



The goat whats YOU.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 05:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adacore is currently offline Adacore

 
Chief Warrant Officer 2

Messages: 156
Registered: February 2005
Location: Shanghai
A factoryless race is, as you described, a race with the worst possible factory settings (that then doesn't build any factories in the game). So efficiency of 5, 25 cost to build and 5 max per 10,000 colonists, with no G-box (obviously).

This has a number of advantages:
- Most obviously, the points can be spent on other things in the race editor, such as better hab, LRTs, mines or cheaper tech. Not necessarily on a better resource ratio for colonists though - 1000 is generally seen as perfectly acceptable, I believe, although I've seen designs with less too.
- You have a lot more industry available in the early game, since you don't have to spend all (any) of your resources building factories. This means that while a normal race will be crippled by a major war in the first 20-30 turns, a -f race would probably find such a war favourable, as they are able to build significant fleets with no negative impact to their economy.
- As they don't rely on installations on planets for resources, just on population, a factoryless race is a lot more mobile and can absorb losses and 'let them hit air' far more easily than a race with factories.
- Factoryless races tend to have very distributed production, which makes it hard for the enemy to knock out key production centres, as there aren't really any (similar to the above).

The disadvantages, of course, are that once you hit the mid-game then races with factories become a lot more powerful economically. While a factoryless race will be lucky to get much more than 600 or 700 resources from a planet, a race with factories will be able to produce thousands. This is particularly important for the production of capital ships - factoryless races cannot put together an expensive battleship in one turn at any of their planets, and the distributed production makes it hard to assemble the slow trickle of capital ships produced across the empire into a single, powerful fleet.


[Updated on: Wed, 02 July 2008 05:27]

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 05:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
beanspoon is currently offline beanspoon

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 182
Registered: June 2008
Thanks very much, that explains a lot =D




The goat whats YOU.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 05:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Soobie

 
Officer Cadet 3rd Year

Messages: 270
Registered: May 2007
Location: Australia
Adacore wrote on Wed, 02 July 2008 18:55

... factoryless races cannot put together an expensive battleship in one turn at any of their planets ...

IS -f Smile

Actually, I find if I Q up a few BBs then that the first one may take 2 turns, but after that the next 5 or 6 may be 1 a turn (eg: planet has 700 res, ship costs 850 res). Doing that can bugger up balancing research though.

Quote:

... hard to assemble the slow trickle of capital ships produced across the empire into a single, powerful fleet.

IT -f Smile

But most Beamer BBs can be consolidated pretty quickly with minimal losses - I'm usually happy to wear the losses.

The other thing I like about -f is mineral balancing. Generally so easy compared to HG and HP. Oh, and my ships can be 'germ heavy'.

I also like taking -f planets around mid game. For some reason I find -f players stockpile mins instead of using them. Damned if I know why. Building too many mines I guess.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 06:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adacore is currently offline Adacore

 
Chief Warrant Officer 2

Messages: 156
Registered: February 2005
Location: Shanghai
Very good point on the mineral balancing and germ use. Suddenly you can fill your ships with computers galore at far less effective cost as -f Very Happy

I think stockpiling minerals as -f happens for a few reasons - firstly they tend to have lots of mines (since they're just building mines, not factories), secondly the relatively low ratio of resources to planets means the maximum rate they can spend minerals from a given planet is much lower than a race with factories, and finally (not completely -f specific) it's always a nice safety net to have stockpiles of minerals if you don't need a huge fleet right away. I'd tend to think that if someone captures these minerals that's more the fault of the -f not moving them to safer 'rear-area storage depots' than an issue with the -f having them at all.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 06:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
beanspoon is currently offline beanspoon

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 182
Registered: June 2008
Soobie wrote on Wed, 02 July 2008 05:57


I also like taking -f planets around mid game. For some reason I find -f players stockpile mins instead of using them. Damned if I know why. Building too many mines I guess.


Ha ha why stockpile resources when you can shove them through a mass driver and raze your opponents' planets to the ground? Twisted Evil

That's what I've always loved about mass drivers - not only can you send massive amounts of resources from one planet to another at high speed without the need for ships, but you can also use them as a giant planetary cannon for shooting other planets out of the sky (so to speak). That's why I like PP races =P

Anyway, back to the topic under discussion - what sort of tactics should a -f race use at different stages of the game then? I would expect that if you have the advantage at the beginning, you should try to do as much damage as possible as quickly as possible.

If you haven't managed to eradicate your enemies early on though, what tactics would you use later on in the game? I've just had a wicked idea that I need to testbed...



The goat whats YOU.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 06:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Soobie

 
Officer Cadet 3rd Year

Messages: 270
Registered: May 2007
Location: Australia
There are quite a lot of posts on -f tactics by some very good players, both here and in the newsgroup. It's worth having a hunt around the forum and skimming.

Regarding late(r) game for -f: I remember playing against a good -f player in mid-late game. He'd spent a lot of time early disrupting supply lines of the players he wasn't actively attacking. This tended to slow down their growth and meant that it delayed the coming of the 'usual' mid-late game problems for him. Also, he was expanding into other turf so fast that even as the factoried races should have been catching up, the fact was they weren't.

He also had a knack for being able to predict who was going to hit him next and where vs. which planets he was willing to give up without a fight. So I would send in a fleet and score a planet, only to discover I got it completely wrong as to where my ships should be, and he was gallivanting around with quite a few smaller fleet annhilating one of my (or someone elses) expensive and time consuming to build planets. (ie: he picked his battles carefully.)


[Updated on: Wed, 02 July 2008 06:38]

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 06:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adacore is currently offline Adacore

 
Chief Warrant Officer 2

Messages: 156
Registered: February 2005
Location: Shanghai
It's not specifically touted as a '-f strategy' article, but if you've not read it already, you should check out Jason Cawley's Operational Stars by Example article, a revised version of which was included in the official strategy guide - http://www.anrokima.de/Strategie_Handbuch/ssg/ssg12.htm

It's a good example-driven explanation of why and how -f races can compete in the mid-late game.


[Updated on: Wed, 02 July 2008 06:57]

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Wed, 02 July 2008 08:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
beanspoon is currently offline beanspoon

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 182
Registered: June 2008
There's an Official Strategy Guide? (With captial letters?)

W00t! Don't worry, I've found it!


[Updated on: Wed, 02 July 2008 08:09]




The goat whats YOU.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Thu, 03 July 2008 20:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mlaub is currently offline mlaub

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 744
Registered: November 2003
Location: MN, USA
Adacore wrote on Wed, 02 July 2008 05:55

It's not specifically touted as a '-f strategy' article, but if you've not read it already, you should check out Jason Cawley's Operational Stars by Example article, a revised version of which was included in the official strategy guide - http://www.anrokima.de/Strategie_Handbuch/ssg/ssg12.htm

It's a good example-driven explanation of why and how -f races can compete in the mid-late game.


The guide itself is fine. However, neither does it, or anything said here really clearly define the true power of a -f. I think that any new player interested in creating and running a -f for the first time really needs to understand *how* they can be most effective. I hardly ever see that part discussed. I apologize if I missed someone else's explanation and this is just duplication, or this is truly so obvious to everyone, that no one stated it.

Losing the factories gives you:

1. A very wide hab
2. A very high growth (19% is fine, and I have used 18% with an IS)
3. Allows 3.5 cheap techs easily, if you want them.

You still need one other thing to make this a runaway train.

Required Secret ingredient - Ultra Aggression

This is the combo that makes the -f so powerful in the right hands. The fact that from the start you can have a 1 in 2 hab, or a 1 in 4 with an immunity (arguable the best choice), along with a 19% growth. With aggressive expansion, your population should far out strip your neighbors, by simply having more and better breeder planets. The other stuff talked about is the nuts and bolts of war, but the true power is the early explosive growth, and the effect that has on your targets....errr, I mean neighbors! Wink

Not only will you have more pop in the early years, but you should have the best tech, too. This means that for the first part of the game, your colonies are near untouchable. Or, if someone does manage to destroy your much better tech spacedock, and popdrop you, it has hurt him *far more* than it has hurt you. In fact, as a -f, I like seeing my neighbors build fleets of destroyers and cruisers... Smile

So, essentially, the -f controls space and planets by explosive expansion that is very difficult to counter early with a +f race. This should stunt the growth of your neighbors, or at least some. Further, by stunting the growth of its neighbors (by virture of taking part of *their* share of the planets!), or forcing them to fight early, they effectively create a power and tech difference, which creates its own immediate opportunities (I like to *effectively* take out my fist victim in the 2420's). Picking off the nearest, weakest, most "profitable" neighbors, creates the domino effect from hell. By the time we get to all these strategies that Cawley talks about, the game should be very one sided, in favor of the -f. If for no other reason, minerals would be key here.

Remember, you have given up factories for better tech, growth, but mainly hab. However, you did not give much up in mines. Now that you are hitting the mid to late game, you hopefully have 2x the planets of your nearest competitor. This means you have *way* more minerals. It's time to hang out the sign to all your neighbors. It reads "The End is Near!".

The only game where I played a -f and had difficulty in the late game, was a Huge/Packed (many issues with a -f in a huge). In that large of universe it is actually difficult to *effectively* eliminate everyone before Y2500. Wink However, there was no doubt about the outcome of the game. How do you fight an opponent that doesn't care about planetary losses, and his mineral supply is still growing after 25 turns of endgame ship building? An AR, maybe, if there are any left, but that race is a primary target. Twisted Evil

As a disclaimer, I will point out that anyone who is very good, plays a specific designed HG, can truly screw with a -f enough to set it off its game, possibly even beat it, if the HG got a lucky hab draw. As you can run an HG in full -f mode if needed. And, of course, running into another -f truly sucks.

-
...




Global Warming - A climatic change eagerly awaited by most Minnesotans.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Fri, 04 July 2008 03:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
joseph is currently offline joseph

 
Lt. Junior Grade

Messages: 440
Registered: May 2003
Location: Bristol
Matt - you missed explicitly stating that you should have ISB (yes I know some -f dont have it but it is the killer LRT for -f)

Also speaking as someone who has lost a number of games with -f your biggest enemies are complacency, distance and diplomacy.

Complacency - you are placing 1st or 2nd you spend a few turns to many getting nice to have tech and sufficent minelayers and ...forget to be attacking someone.
Distance - the further away your neighbours are the harder it is to damage their growth and take their planet share.
Diplomacy - everyone you make a NAP with limits your boarders of expansion (note ally with players the other side of your neighbours and crush them between you). I once managed due to stupid diplomacy to surround myself with allies (would have been great if I was a HP).



Joseph
"Can burn the land and boil the sea. You cant take the Stars from me"

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Fri, 04 July 2008 05:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adacore is currently offline Adacore

 
Chief Warrant Officer 2

Messages: 156
Registered: February 2005
Location: Shanghai
Yeah - I think the key point for -f (that comes across from both Joseph and mlaub's posts) is that if at any year after about 2420 you're not in the process of attacking someone, something's gone wrong.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Fri, 04 July 2008 14:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mlaub is currently offline mlaub

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 744
Registered: November 2003
Location: MN, USA
joseph wrote on Fri, 04 July 2008 02:59

Matt - you missed explicitly stating that you should have ISB (yes I know some -f dont have it but it is the killer LRT for -f)


I mentioned spacedocks in one sentence, so it was on my mind Wink

It is nice, but like you say, not 100% necessary. I would make this more dependant on universe size/Race more than anything else. Medium or smaller is almost a given to use ISB.


Quote:


Also speaking as someone who has lost a number of games with -f your biggest enemies are complacency, distance and diplomacy.

Complacency - you are placing 1st or 2nd you spend a few turns to many getting nice to have tech and sufficent minelayers and ...forget to be attacking someone.


Yep, if you tend to complacency, you should play a different style race. I assume that any -f I run into does not want any game long friends, shouldn't receive any of my tech, and will attack me as soon as there is an opening. Any quarter shown to a -f will come back to bite you 9 times out of 10.
Quote:


Distance - the further away your neighbours are the harder it is to damage their growth and take their planet share.


Well, your expansion and tech just needs to ramp up that much faster. Wink One of my earliest colonies in the huge was over 300ly from my HW to a near perfect breeder on the edge of another players "space". Imagine his surprise when I started moving into "his" territory! Did I stunt his growth? yep.
Quote:


Diplomacy - everyone you make a NAP with limits your boarders of expansion (note ally with players the other side of your neighbours and crush them between you). I once managed due to stupid diplomacy to surround myself with allies (would have been great if I was a HP).


Exactly.

-Matt



Global Warming - A climatic change eagerly awaited by most Minnesotans.

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Thu, 29 January 2009 15:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Sully is currently offline Sully

 
Crewman 1st Class

Messages: 39
Registered: January 2004
I agree with All of the aforementioned Insight.
I've only tried -f 3 times & win twice.
Both times that I came out on top was when I was attacking as soon as I had a target. The one
time I lost was when I got land locked by NAP's & Allies.
The -f strategy seems to be as straight forward as that.


[Updated on: Thu, 29 January 2009 15:30]

Report message to a moderator

Re: -f explained Thu, 29 January 2009 16:42 Go to previous message
joseph is currently offline joseph

 
Lt. Junior Grade

Messages: 440
Registered: May 2003
Location: Bristol
Yes the play style of a -f has been memorably compared to acting like a "Rabid Weasel"


Joseph
"Can burn the land and boil the sea. You cant take the Stars from me"

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Moving Stars!
Next Topic: quite crowded starter colony
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 05 11:18:23 EDT 2024