Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » HE / AR colonizers compared (split from "Known Bugs")
HE / AR colonizers compared (split from "Known Bugs") Tue, 05 October 2004 06:48 Go to next message
Staz is currently offline Staz

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 514
Registered: November 2003
Location: UK
multilis wrote on Tue, 05 October 2004 01:54

I would like to clarify that an AR using a non-AR coloniser to build initial oribital fort is NOT a bug.

Speak now or forever hold your peace if my HE works with an AR to minicolonise orbital fort everywhere!


For anyone interested, the numbers on this are as follows...

                  	Iro	Bor	Ger	Res
				
Orbital Fort......	11	 0	15	35
				
Coloniser Hull....	 9	 0	13	18
Fuel Mizer........	 6	 0	 0	 8
Orbital Con.......	18	13	13	18
Total.............	33	13	26	44
				
				
Mini Col Hull.....	 2	 0	 2	 3
Settlers Delight..	 1	 0	 1	 2
Col Module........	11	 9	 9	 9
Total.............	14	 9	12	14


A very significant saving in minerals and resources. Orbital forts for 14 resources for example.

The description for the orbital construction module ("this module contains an empty orbital hull") suggests that the game designers' intent was that it is the component and not the PRT that enables construction of the fort. That would make this exploit a bug.

I'd suggest that it gets added to the bugs list so that individual hosts can decide whether to allow it.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Tue, 05 October 2004 17:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
LEit is currently offline LEit

 
Lt. Commander

Messages: 879
Registered: April 2003
Location: CT
Don't forget that you get 75% of the colonization fleet back.
And gift ships drop that amount by 70%. (total return of 22.5%)
Resources still apply.


So the hull that cost 33 13 26 will return 25 10 20, for a total mineral cost of 8 3 6.

The mini-colony ship cost of 14 9 12 will return 3 2 3, for a total mineral cost of 11 7 9.

Net mineral costs are higher for the spore clouds, but the resource cost is lower. Engines are better on the spore clouds too.



- LEit

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Wed, 06 October 2004 07:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kotk

 
Commander

Messages: 1227
Registered: May 2003
Also dont forget the free fort. Wink

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Wed, 06 October 2004 10:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
LEit is currently offline LEit

 
Lt. Commander

Messages: 879
Registered: April 2003
Location: CT
You get the fort in either case.

I'm not saying that the spore clouds are a bad deal, just that at least for minerals, they're not as good as they first appear.



- LEit

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Wed, 06 October 2004 11:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
icebird is currently offline icebird

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 178
Registered: September 2003
Location: In LaLa land...
I'd still rather have 30 resources than 10 or so minerals, and a HE can better afford to build ships in the early game than an AR can- faster energy tech helps the AR more than any tech helps the HE, which is where the resources would likely go no matter who built the ships.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Wed, 06 October 2004 12:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
multilis is currently offline multilis

 
Lt. Commander

Messages: 789
Registered: October 2003
Location: Edmonton, Canada
I played a little with the design and an AR does not gain as much from growth rate as normal race (sqrt growth rate gain in resources rather than growth rate of other races).

So ended up with an AR, 1i, 1w, 1n that could start with nearly half the planets green (or close to green yellows). By spreading thinner the AR can get a boost in resources early and the combo of HE providing lots of fast minicolonisers and mini-fuel boosters and an AR just focusing on techs and a bit of orbital fort improvements seems quite nasty.

(Early HE has surplus iron that AR wants, AR has surplus germ).

Maybe this is good as AR and HE are the two most picked on races so a team of such could use a boost.


[Updated on: Wed, 06 October 2004 12:33]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Thu, 07 October 2004 19:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kotk

 
Commander

Messages: 1227
Registered: May 2003
Early AR has no germ. Any germ it has goes to build some medium freighters, then maybe large freighters from 2411 and then Ultras from 2430. Cant build miners from dock and so maybe 2440 it starts to have some useless germ. Wink

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Fri, 08 October 2004 11:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
multilis is currently offline multilis

 
Lt. Commander

Messages: 789
Registered: October 2003
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Quote:


Early AR has no germ. Any germ it has goes to build some medium freighters, then maybe large freighters from 2411 and then Ultras from 2430. Cant build miners from dock and so maybe 2440 it starts to have some useless germ.


See what you mean by germ consumption of medium freighters, large freighters. The HE will be building the colonisers.

My experience so far has been with taking former AR planets after they started miners and there was lots of germ. Smile

With close knit early HE+AR as described may be relying on privateers rather than medium freighters. As well may need to build iron heavier warships or bases on top of transports.

As well perhaps sometimes even galleons with fuel mizers rather than large freighters... in trans game (battleship hull not allowed), the gallean made a nice duel purpose warship/emergency freighter. (Especially to protect against packet attacks). With cheap engines and man-jets + the extra hull fuel meant range/speed of a cruiser, and the 4 shield slots + 6 weapons + extra bit of armour gave feel of poor man's battlecruiser. I used range 2 weapons (half gattlings) and saw ship as a useful chaff defender+skirmisher that would out init default cruiser with range 3 weapons. (or with jihads+computers rather than beamers+manjets). Throwing out ideas as alternative to cruisers.


[Updated on: Fri, 08 October 2004 11:12]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Mineral upload / download (Re: Known Bugs (JRC3)) Sun, 10 October 2004 06:14 Go to previous message
Micha

 

Messages: 2342
Registered: November 2002
Location: Belgium GMT +1
multilis wrote on Fri, 08 October 2004 17:05

Throwing out ideas as alternative to cruisers.

And getting off topic again. Wink
If you want to continue discussing Cruiser vs Galleon please start a new topic, or pick up an old one, no doubt this has been discussed (many many many) times before ...

mch,
mod.a.w.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Who do you attack first?
Next Topic: AR design and play (split from "NAS vs no NAS")
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun May 05 14:02:21 EDT 2024