Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Bar » Surrender
Surrender Wed, 10 August 2011 20:50 Go to next message
LittleEddie is currently offline LittleEddie

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 517
Registered: February 2011
Location: Delaware
Quote:

XXXX would like to announce their surrender to the combined might of the xxxxxx. Our Surrender is unconditional....


So what in the Stars does this mean?

the game is "only one other player may be set to friend, everyone else enemy" so you can't have an alliance of 3 or more players.

They submitted a turn after surrendering, so they are not just quitting?

So what do you do after you surrender?

What's the status of my NAP with you if you surrender to someone else. Since your no longer in control on your moves, you surrendered!!!.



[Updated on: Wed, 10 August 2011 21:04]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Wed, 10 August 2011 21:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
slimdrag00n is currently offline slimdrag00n

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 630
Registered: January 2009
Location: new york -5


I would just take his planets Very Happy



......
Ranked games: 8-1
Recently won the game Knife Fight.
Looking for a practice duel.
.......

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Wed, 10 August 2011 22:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eagle of Fire

 
Lt. Commander

Messages: 809
Registered: December 2008
Location: GMT -5
That is not a conventional thing to do in STARS!. As far as I know there is no standard for this.

If you know the player who is surrendering can be trusted or is honorable, it can work well. If not then expect them to simply bide their time.

In short, deal with this the same way you would deal with anything else in this game.



STARS! Wiki
STARS! Wiki Français
I am on a hot streak... Literally.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Thu, 11 August 2011 11:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jools is currently offline jools

 
Crewman 1st Class

Messages: 32
Registered: March 2005
Location: UK
It was me that surrendered and incase anyone was wondering it was a final diplomatic throw of the dice.

I thought about just plain giving up and dropping, but then I it occurred to me that might affect the sweet, sweet taste of victory that someone else might enjoy, so I'm going to continue a while longer.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Thu, 11 August 2011 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
LittleEddie is currently offline LittleEddie

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 517
Registered: February 2011
Location: Delaware
I'm trying to figure out what "unconditional surrender" means in Stars.

In the RW, it means your laying down your arms and not fighting anymore and excepting whatever the victor demands.

To do that in this game of Stars (because of the rules), I would think, you would have to destroy your own warships and then allow your planets to be bombed or Pop Dropped without building more defenses.

But I don't think that's what happening here.

Ed

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Thu, 11 August 2011 11:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
slimdrag00n is currently offline slimdrag00n

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 630
Registered: January 2009
Location: new york -5

I am not sure why you surrendered Jools. You seemed to be holding off decently thus why we haven't moved forward in the last few turns. We only destroyed old fleets and a couple planets.

Now you have DN's though if you really are -f you should not be building them because you will never get the numbers you need to make them scary.

I am looking forward to some battles and challenge. There is no point for anyone to surrender because it wont make someone just stop War without benefits.

Unfortunately for the Nmidians and Froggies, I rolled right over them thus you are right you leaving would make this game unappetizing. I appreciate you sticking around because some players would just stop playing as soon as they see my army. Lets see one last good battle.



......
Ranked games: 8-1
Recently won the game Knife Fight.
Looking for a practice duel.
.......

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Thu, 11 August 2011 12:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
slimdrag00n is currently offline slimdrag00n

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 630
Registered: January 2009
Location: new york -5

LittleEddie wrote on Thu, 11 August 2011 11:48

I'm trying to figure out what "unconditional surrender" means in Stars.

In the RW, it means your laying down your arms and not fighting anymore and excepting whatever the victor demands.

To do that in this game of Stars (because of the rules), I would think, you would have to destroy your own warships and then allow your planets to be bombed or Pop Dropped without building more defenses.

But I don't think that's what happening here.

Ed


Basically if I accepted his surrender in the way he wanted he would have wanted me to leave him be so instead of continuing my assault on his planets. I probably would have made him attack you and the other players in the east in order to keep him alive.
I don't see any rules that have to deal with surrender?

Jools has two scary races to worry about. We declined the surrender. We will finish the war they started.

Peaces logical choice would be to help NC's or attack them while they are down. Whichever benefits the most.




......
Ranked games: 8-1
Recently won the game Knife Fight.
Looking for a practice duel.
.......

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Thu, 11 August 2011 12:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
m.a@stars is currently offline m.a@stars

 
Commander

Messages: 2765
Registered: October 2004
Location: Third star to the left
Eagle of Fire wrote on Thu, 11 August 2011 04:46

deal with this the same way you would deal with anything else in this game.

Nod Sneaky Rolling Eyes Twisted Evil Lurking Pirate



So many Stars, so few Missiles!

In space no one can hear you scheme! Deal

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Thu, 11 August 2011 16:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jools is currently offline jools

 
Crewman 1st Class

Messages: 32
Registered: March 2005
Location: UK
I surrendered because although me and Val have held off the attacks from Centauri, I have long suspected that you have been biding your time and once you started building in a big way, my life would get very difficult. Also I have never played a vassal before, it might have been interesting...

I have also been fustrated by the rest of the universe's attempts to stop you and Cent (Valkillers excepted). It is a single race victory afterall, no points for 3rd!

I would just like to correct a couple of points you made, firstly, you declared war on me by pop dropping Uranium - I didn't start the war!

Secondly, Taka have opportunistically attacked me too, so I actually have three races to deal with, not just two!

I will give you your last battle and then bow out

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Fri, 12 August 2011 10:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nmid

 
Commander

Messages: 1608
Registered: January 2011
Location: GMT +5.5

LittleEddie wrote on Thu, 11 August 2011 06:20

Quote:

XXXX would like to announce their surrender to the combined might of the xxxxxx. Our Surrender is unconditional....


So what in the Stars does this mean?

the game is "only one other player may be set to friend, everyone else enemy" so you can't have an alliance of 3 or more players.

They submitted a turn after surrendering, so they are not just quitting?

So what do you do after you surrender?

What's the status of my NAP with you if you surrender to someone else. Since your no longer in control on your moves, you surrendered!!!.




I think it's a nice way of just saying "I'm dead, leave me alone" Razz

On the other hand, he could also play it out like a vassal, a non allied cog who wouldn't obviously attack the bigger empire, who will now take over the best worlds they want, while the remaining worlds will be used by the player to stay in the game and attack the bigger empire's enemies.


[Updated on: Fri, 12 August 2011 10:04]




I know my minefields.. but I'm a chaff sweeper.
I used to curse when I got stuck in traffic... till I realised I AM traffic.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Fri, 12 August 2011 10:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
nmid

 
Commander

Messages: 1608
Registered: January 2011
Location: GMT +5.5

jools wrote on Fri, 12 August 2011 02:11

vassal


You stole the word right out of my mouth !!



I know my minefields.. but I'm a chaff sweeper.
I used to curse when I got stuck in traffic... till I realised I AM traffic.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Fri, 12 August 2011 10:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BlueTurbit

 
Lt. Commander

RIP
BlueTurbit died Oct. 20, 2011

Messages: 835
Registered: October 2002
Location: Heart of Texas
Surrender? Why not just activate the Omega 13? Very Happy

Galaxy Quest clip



BlueTurbit Country/Rock

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Sun, 14 August 2011 20:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Taka Tuka

 
Master Chief Petty Officer

Messages: 102
Registered: March 2004
Location: Germany
jools wrote on Thu, 11 August 2011 16:41


Secondly, Taka have opportunistically attacked me too, so I actually have three races to deal with, not just two!


Interesting statement I have discovered now. I'm blamed to be an "opportunistically attacker" Laughing

Jools, may I remind you, that YOU kicked me off as your ally Evil or Very Mad - in a game, where 1 ally is possible only! So I remained alone without ally, because the other players had allies already or were newbies who didn't understand the sense of alliances or communication.

You wanted me to fight for you and your new ally but didn't want to give me any share out of possible benefits. As well YOU canceled our NAP later.

Do you really think it is alright to blame me an "opportunistical attacker" under this circumstances? ROFLMAO

Without an ally I couldn't win in a game of alliances. Because of newbies and our less diplomatic skills the game seemed to be decided early. At least the winning alliance agrred into a NAP with me - under very fair conditions. They accepted that I DIDN'T want to take part in war AGAINST YOU, BUT YOU decided to see me as an possible enemy after I didn't want to be the enemy of your enemy - and YOU canceled our NAP.

At least YOU put me into the position where I'm now. If I would be a Vasall of Slim/Centaurian I would have the duty to attack you. But to attack you is not my duty, it's a kind of revenge - and - not like a vasall - I can keep the planets I conquer from you Laughing

Kind regards, Taka Tuka Twisted Evil

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Sun, 14 August 2011 22:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
LittleEddie is currently offline LittleEddie

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 517
Registered: February 2011
Location: Delaware
So we are like in turn 69 Going insane and I haven't even had a battle that involves, like, 20 ships are so. I had, like, 1 good war, build a bunch of ships, and, like, won without even firing a shot Cheers .

So, I'm like, going to just keep doing what working so well so far. I have this NAP thingie with, like, three players, and I, like, honor the NAP.

But the thingie is, like, the best way for you to not know I'm doing, is, like, for you to not know what I'm doing. So I'm, like going to stop you from knowing what I'm doing.

I'm not, like, taking planets and destroying worlds, just like, a ship here and there.

Peace from In Pieces

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Tue, 16 August 2011 11:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
slimdrag00n is currently offline slimdrag00n

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 630
Registered: January 2009
Location: new york -5

jools wrote on Thu, 11 August 2011 16:41



I would just like to correct a couple of points you made, firstly, you declared war on me by pop dropping Uranium - I didn't start the war!

I will give you your last battle and then bow out



I am not 100% sure but I thought how it went down was this.

You and Taka were allied in beginning and you helped Taka make attacks toward Centurians. It was a weird early war due to it seemed like you guys did not accomplish anything. I was made an enemy because my ally was being attacked. Maybe you did not have much to do with your allies attacks but I looked at it as your team was the aggressor.


I think current year Centurians just took most of your army because you decided to send ships in space and not gate them. I see bunch of jug cc's but that's about it now.

The only reason I agree that I don't mind you leaving is because our armies will just go over your planets and bomb for one year. Dunno if you can make a difference at this point?
Mainly because I want the game to Gen faster to get more turns in. Laughing



......
Ranked games: 8-1
Recently won the game Knife Fight.
Looking for a practice duel.
.......

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Tue, 16 August 2011 12:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jools is currently offline jools

 
Crewman 1st Class

Messages: 32
Registered: March 2005
Location: UK
Taka,

It seems that you have some anger issues...I can understand why, but I would like to point out to anyone else reading that I haven't done anything outside of our agreements, indeed I have always given plenty of warning of my actions and I also continued to give you tech even after I'd said I was planning to end the alliance.

Don't think I used the expression "Opportunistic attacker" with any malice, none was intended. For a long time I have suspected that Amazon/Centauri would be virtually unstoppable, so I needed to take some risks - which haven't paid off, but hey, I considered myself dead anyway! I suspect me and you differ becuase I would rather try and win and die than survive and accept third place.


Slim - I'm looking forward to the end of game thread, and we can discuss who started war with who etc. in lots of detail then. if you were wondering though, my ships were in space because all the gates in the area had been destroyed.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Sun, 28 August 2011 04:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
neilhoward

 
Commander

Messages: 1112
Registered: April 2008
Location: SW3 & 10023
blast! Posting in the bar so I cannot delete your posts. Tricky Tricky. Twisted Evil

edit for word-filter


[Updated on: Sun, 28 August 2011 04:45]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Sun, 28 August 2011 12:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Taka Tuka

 
Master Chief Petty Officer

Messages: 102
Registered: March 2004
Location: Germany
Hi Jools,

jools wrote on Tue, 16 August 2011 12:48

Taka,
It seems that you have some anger issues...I can understand why, but I would like to point out to anyone else reading that I haven't done anything outside of our agreements,


I want to confirm this. Everything was within the agreement and correct.

jools wrote on Tue, 16 August 2011 12:48

indeed I have always given plenty of warning of my actions and I also continued to give you tech even after I'd said I was planning to end the alliance.


Thank you for warning, but what could I have done? There were no players left waiting for me as a new ally Evil or Very Mad. You not gave tech only, you received tech by me as well. We just exchanged until the end of our alliance.

jools wrote on Tue, 16 August 2011 12:48

Don't think I used the expression "Opportunistic attacker" with any malice, none was intended. For a long time I have suspected that Amazon/Centauri would be virtually unstoppable, so I needed to take some risks - which haven't paid off, but hey, I considered myself dead anyway! I suspect me and you differ becuase I would rather try and win and die than survive and accept third place.


We together knew a long time ago that the game was almost decided after Nmid was eliminated and other alliances didn't want to go to war. As a single player without an ally I didn't have the tech to withstand. So I had the choice only to help you to withstand and maybe to win or to let Amazon/Centaurian win. I didn't want to help you without some benefit but you was thinking about me as a second class partner and didn't want to give me anything more and claimed nearly all Amazon/Centaurian planets for you and ValKillers.

Amazon/Centaurian agreed with me into a NAP and exchanged planets I wanted from you, in case "we" would win, with planets from my area. So at least I became the wanted planets without fighting for you Very Happy.

As well Amazon/Centaurian accepted that I did not want to take part in their war with you and I did not want to attack you, as I agreed into a NAP with them.

I started to take part in war after you not wanted to accept that I not wanted to support you without benefit for me and you have canceled our NAP. At the same time you and Valkillers sent big fleets into my area without telling me they were for meeting the MT (you told me much later). After this I had no choice anymore Twisted Evil.

I wonder that you couldn't imagine I could have an agreement with Amazon/Centaurian as you canceled our NAP. Or did you underestimate my tech too much and was thinking I would be conquered by you fast and easily? Or did you believe I would worry you too much that I would prefer to survive as your vasal? Very Happy

Cu, Taka Tuka



[Updated on: Sun, 28 August 2011 12:33]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Sun, 28 August 2011 13:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
LittleEddie is currently offline LittleEddie

 
Lieutenant
Helped track down one or more Stars bugs

Messages: 517
Registered: February 2011
Location: Delaware
Beware the sleeping giant Troll

Report message to a moderator

Re: Surrender Sun, 28 August 2011 19:47 Go to previous message
Centaurian is currently offline Centaurian

 
Petty Officer 3rd Class

Messages: 41
Registered: November 2010
jools wrote on Thu, 11 August 2011 16:41

I would just like to correct a couple of points you made, firstly, you declared war on me by pop dropping Uranium - I didn't start the war!


Just noticed this. I don't get out much Smile

Uranium is 315ly from your HW.

It is 164ly from mine.

Anyway, I thought I'd pop-dropped it!

Nevertheless, colonising Uranium in my territory without agreement was the act of war. IIRC you planet hopped your way there too.

Reviewing our previous communications, you seem to be averse to numbers and equity when negotiating borders... so when you didn't get what you wanted, you decided to take it, it seems.

I guess we Centaurians had bigger teeth than you expected.

Centaurian.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Sense of playing a senseless game?
Next Topic: In need of a Host
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 07 17:45:10 EDT 2024