Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » Engines
Engines Sun, 15 October 2006 02:26 Go to next message
knightpraetor is currently offline knightpraetor

 
Chief Warrant Officer 1

Messages: 154
Registered: October 2006
so what engine combinations are worth getting, like so far i've enjoyed using IFE with NRS, and I think it is viable to do full IFE (though i'm not sure how useful it is), but i have no clue whether it's worth doing NRS by itself..does that slow down early growth too much (i assume cheap engines is usually too horrible to be worth getting).

Finally..i really didn't think itw as worth clicking neither IFE or NRS...because in that case you get both...it seems a waste..you're only going to use one type right?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Engines Sun, 15 October 2006 04:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
iztok is currently offline iztok

 
Commander

Messages: 1206
Registered: April 2003
Location: Slovenia, Europe
Hi!
knightpraetor wrote on Sun, 15 October 2006 08:26

so what engine combinations are worth getting, like so far i've enjoyed using IFE with NRS...

With prop expensive that's the most common combo, and quite often coupled with grav immunity. Without immunity it actually gives you ~25 RW points, allows really fast start, and saves lots of research in prop, needed for better scoops and grav terra-15. Also saves quite some germ for factories (and later for Nubians), and gives you warp-10 and battle speed 2.25 quite early in the game.

OTOH is the IS-10 engine VERY expensive, and very heavy, so it is reserved for BBs/Nubs mostly. But that's a small drawback, that comes into play in the mid-game, where one (being faster in expanding and gaining better economy) can quite easily compensate.

IMO that "IFE+NRSE+prop expensive" combo is too strong. NRSE should give back significantly less points.

BR, Iztok

Report message to a moderator

Re: Engines Mon, 16 October 2006 22:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dogthinkers is currently offline Dogthinkers

 
Commander

Messages: 1316
Registered: August 2003
Location: Hiding from Meklar
Sometimes I play without IFE or NRSE. It's painfull to live without the fuel mizer in early game, but in the mid game you get rewarded with cheap lightweight engines.

Works well for -F races that don't need the germ elsewhere *if* you can cope with the lack of the FM. IS for example, can cope well thanks to their cheap and early tech fuel transports.

Another thought - all those prop exensive races will be keen to buy prop12 from you - being significantly different to the other races works wonders for diplomacy.

Another diplomatic advantage: if many races are grav immune and you are grav narrow there's often potential for hab sharing.

If you get a strong ally sometimes you can even buy FM LFs, but timing can be a problem here, it's one of those very time critical trades...

Overall though, +IFE +NRSE +prop_exp +grav_imm is a very strong combination. It's hard to look past, but there are viable alternatives. I agree with Iztok that NRSE should give less points - as it stands I don't think you need points back as the IS10 is arguably reason enough to give up ramscoops on it's own...


[Updated on: Mon, 16 October 2006 22:33]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Engines Tue, 17 October 2006 01:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Coyote is currently offline Coyote

 
Lt. Commander

Messages: 906
Registered: November 2002
Location: Pacific NW

I used to go IFE/NRSE/Grav immune a lot.

If you're IT you don't need IFE. Don't take NRSE. Go radiation immune and use the Radiating Hydro-Ramscoop for your first main engine.

ISB is nice as an alternative to IFE, as you can use spacedocks as fuel depots; especially if your hab range is wide.


[Updated on: Tue, 17 October 2006 01:02]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Engines Wed, 11 July 2007 09:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Soobie

 
Officer Cadet 3rd Year

Messages: 270
Registered: May 2007
Location: Australia
Coyote wrote on Tue, 17 October 2006 14:31

I used to go IFE/NRSE/Grav immune a lot.

If you're IT you don't need IFE. Don't take NRSE. Go radiation immune and use the Radiating Hydro-Ramscoop for your first main engine.

ISB is nice as an alternative to IFE, as you can use spacedocks as fuel depots; especially if your hab range is wide.


OK, oldish thread, but I gets me thinking of questions :S

Does anyone play ISB/NRSE/NO IFE/prop cheap (or normal) (/not grav imm)(/not IT)?

I tried it with an HP after reading this just now against AIs and it does quite well but lets face it, they are AIs and you can beat them in your sleep. I mean, does it work against humans? Biggest nuisance was that the CCs were hard to gate during the 150/600 era, which came early (but didn't last long).

Report message to a moderator

Re: Engines Wed, 11 July 2007 12:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
joseph is currently offline joseph

 
Lt. Junior Grade

Messages: 440
Registered: May 2003
Location: Bristol
Quote:

Does anyone play ISB/NRSE/NO IFE/prop cheap (or normal) (/not grav imm)(/not IT)?


I play ISB/NRSE/No IFE/not grav immune fairly often particularly with IS.

I do normally take prop expensive though as if you have NRSE you will only research prop to lvl12
(It is the NRSE that makes most people take prop expensive).

The more expensive engines are a pain but as I tend to build factory heavy IS races the savings on germ help make up for it (a bit Sad )



Joseph
"Can burn the land and boil the sea. You cant take the Stars from me"

Report message to a moderator

Re: Engines Wed, 11 July 2007 17:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kotk

 
Commander

Messages: 1227
Registered: May 2003
Soobie wrote on Wed, 11 July 2007 16:24

Does anyone play ISB/NRSE/NO IFE/prop cheap (or normal) (/not grav imm)(/not IT)?

Yes, if it is nubian universe (medium/normal+ without slow tecs) then i usually consider that. With cheap prop ... prop 16 costs ~55K res and prop 23 costs another 165K res. So can build some defensive force of IS-10 BB-s (to support your ultras) and with ~4 years for cost of ~275 nubs to research real @$$-kicker engine. Very Happy

Alternative is ... no NRSE with normal prop (prop 16 being the ceiling and costing ~110K res). OK ... put ~180 nubians less resources into propulsion. However prop 9 (TGFS) BB is weaker Ultra defender than IS-10 BB. Prop 16 engine (TGMS) costs germanium that is deficite with HP. TGMS nub is 33kT heavier than TS-10 nub. As result ... it is hard to predict. Plusses and minuses. Confused If he goes for prop 23 as well then ... who just lost the points of no NRSE in rw. Wink

Report message to a moderator

Topic split (Re: Engines) Thu, 12 July 2007 03:49 Go to previous message
Micha

 

Messages: 2342
Registered: November 2002
Location: Belgium GMT +1
Question about engines on smaller hulls split to here.

mch,
modaw

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Methods of Claiming Territory
Next Topic: Engines on smaller hulls
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Apr 27 19:00:16 EDT 2024