Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Academy » How did THAT happen?!?
How did THAT happen?!? |
Wed, 19 February 2003 13:56 |
|
Chee | | Senior Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 91
Registered: November 2002 Location: Cincinnati, OH | |
|
A strange thing just happened to me in one of the Stars! games I'm currently playing. I don't know if this is some sort of bug, if there's something going on here that I'm missing, or if this is just plain bad luck. Let me explain:
2548, the end game is playing out in this 13 player large universe. I'm in first place (barely) and fighting heavily with the second place contender. Most of the other races are neutral or only passively helping out here and there. I was moving a fleet of bombers and Nubians from one planet to another through seemingly clear space, when I hit a minefield and lost this significant fleet.
I was moving from Perseus (2023, 1403) to Vega (1996, 1391). That's less than 30 ly, so I was only moving warp 6. I had a starbase coming up at Vega and a minefield there to protect my fleet from any immediate engagement. The only minefield I figure this fleet could have hit was located at 2086, 1390. This is on the opposite side of Perseus, but both the minefield and Vega (the destination planet) are a little bit south of Perseus. I had swept the minefield the previous turn from Perseus with the fleet that was now retreating to Vega. Yet somehow this fleet managed to hit the minefield, never even leaving the orbit of Perseus, destroying all the mini-bombers and leaving the rest of the fleet open prey for an incoming enemy attack.
How is that possible?
Even if the minefield extended beyond Perseus, (which it didn't!!) the odds of me hitting that minefield without even moving from the planet (traveling at warp 6), are something like 0.6%. That's about 1 in 167. But really the minefield was swept, so I should have moved clean through.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Dan
(edit, fixing my mis-typed coordinates)
[Updated on: Wed, 19 February 2003 13:58] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Wed, 19 February 2003 17:23 |
|
|
1. If this is a game you'r playing don't give away co-ordinates of (whats left of) your fleets - bad idea but this is a little off subject.
2. Cloaked minelayers? Possibility??
3. As with all things mathematical (Zoid leaves the room) even if the odds are 0.6% of it happening doesn't mean it wont happen. I've had fleets travel warp 8 through enemy minefields and hit nothing. I've had fleets travel warp 5 for 10 ly and disappear from the mortal plain.... it don't happen often but it does happen.
(edit cuz for some reason I wrote "I'd have" rather than "I've had".... damn I'm dumb.)
[Updated on: Wed, 19 February 2003 17:24] Report message to a moderator
|
|
| |
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Thu, 20 February 2003 06:46 |
|
|
Marduk wrote on Wed, 19 February 2003 20:17 | Is there an SD race in the game? It could have been a minefield laid during movement, most likely set to detonate immediately.
|
Sort of difficult for an SD to do that. You can lay a field on arrival... but the default detonate/do not detonate setting is "safe" mode and that has to be changed manually.
- Kurt
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Thu, 20 February 2003 07:45 |
|
Chee | | Senior Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 91
Registered: November 2002 Location: Cincinnati, OH | |
|
Thanks for your responces. I'm still trying to figure it all out. Here's some more data: The distance from Perseus to the minefield (in 2547) is 64.33 ly, the radius of the minefield is 64 ly. So I clearly should have been clear of this minefield.
Right?
In answer to some of the other questions and comments:
This the end game, like a mentioned before. Pretty much everyone knows what's happening, plus with the score public now and most people maxed out tech wise, there's really nothing and no way to hide.
Cloaked minelayers? I would have seen them. This is the end game, I'm IS and have some tachyon ships nearby. I can see quite well. Not only any cloaked fleets, but any nearby minefields that might have been in the path of movement.
Yes, 0.6% certainly doesn't mean it is NEVER going to happen, but with the minefield where it was, and the fleet moving in the other direction, I don't understand why there would even be a 0.6% chance.
There are no SD races in this game.
Any other thoughts?
Thanks,
Dan
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Thu, 20 February 2003 13:14 |
|
|
Perhaps there was a tiny minefield there that you didn't notice, and the hit was just enough to deplete it?
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Thu, 20 February 2003 13:49 |
|
yucaf | | Master Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 100
Registered: December 2002 Location: India | |
|
Chee wrote on Thu, 20 February 2003 07:45 | Thanks for your responces. I'm still trying to figure it all out. Here's some more data: The distance from Perseus to the minefield (in 2547) is 64.33 ly, the radius of the minefield is 64 ly. So I clearly should have been clear of this minefield.
Right?
|
Wrong.
Because of rounding (up), you have to be at least 65 l.y. away to be considered out of the mine field. I had this experience in several games. In your case you seem to have been unlucky indeed.
Also it seems that heavy fields with very big laying fleets can somehow overflow "before" being swept. This is a bug. Maybe works as well with standards? In my experience, I understand it that way:
1-the field is layed, encloses the ennemy fleet
2-the ennemy fleet attempt to move and hit
3- the field is swept (somehow) and reduced enough to show as out of range of the fleet damaged.
{of course all in the same turn so you don't actually get to see the field enclosing your ship}
I don't know the mecanics exactly but some weird behavior has been observed with mine fields hitting when they shouldn't.
Now if you are in late game, you should have nice big shielded ships that shouldn't been destroyed by a single standard mine hit... You mention Nubians... Were they 99 % damaged?
My advice with minefields: play safe, avoid to go "as close as possible" if you don't need to. Don't play star wars in the asteroid field At least to me, it saved some ship from the eternal void...
Also one good way to figure exactly what happened is to ask the owner of the field what he saw on his side. There is nothing secret now, so at least this you can share.
Good luck,
YucaF
Report message to a moderator
|
|
| |
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Thu, 20 February 2003 14:43 |
|
Chee | | Senior Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 91
Registered: November 2002 Location: Cincinnati, OH | |
|
yucaf wrote on Thu, 20 February 2003 13:49 | Because of rounding (up), you have to be at least 65 l.y. away to be considered out of the mine field. I had this experience in several games. In your case you seem to have been unlucky indeed.
Also it seems that heavy fields with very big laying fleets can somehow overflow "before" being swept. This is a bug. Maybe works as well with standards? In my experience, I understand it that way:
1-the field is layed, encloses the ennemy fleet
2-the ennemy fleet attempt to move and hit
3- the field is swept (somehow) and reduced enough to show as out of range of the fleet damaged.
{of course all in the same turn so you don't actually get to see the field enclosing your ship}
I don't know the mecanics exactly but some weird behavior has been observed with mine fields hitting when they shouldn't.
Now if you are in late game, you should have nice big shielded ships that shouldn't been destroyed by a single standard mine hit... You mention Nubians... Were they 99 % damaged?
My advice with minefields: play safe, avoid to go "as close as possible" if you don't need to. Don't play star wars in the asteroid field At least to me, it saved some ship from the eternal void...
Also one good way to figure exactly what happened is to ask the owner of the field what he saw on his side. There is nothing secret now, so at least this you can share.
Good luck,
YucaF
|
Actually fleet movement occurs first, BEFORE mine laying, and then mine sweeping occurs third. So my fleet that swept at the end of the last turn should have been clear to move out this turn. Unless, like you said, there is a bug that rounds the mine field radius up somehow.
As for my fleet; My nubians were not directly destroyed by the minefield. My 300+ mini-bombers, plus various scout, chaf, fuel transports, and mine layers were also lost. However, because the nubians hit the minefield and never left the planet, they became prey for a swarm of enemy nubains that reached the planet next year (if my nubains had moved the 30 ly at warp 6 I had ordered, they would have reached the safety of a starbase, another 100+ nubians and some minefields of my own).
I will ask my opponent what he saw from his side. (Whether he answers or not is another question)
Thanks for the help.
So I guess the question now is; Is this a BUG? Can I justify a regeneration of the turn, or am I stuck with it?
Thanks,
Dan
Report message to a moderator
|
|
| |
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Thu, 20 February 2003 16:09 |
|
|
What you mean to say is that because it's YOUR fleet, you feel cheated. If it was an ENEMY fleet, you'd feel like peeing your pants with laughter.
I should expect the guy who was gonna be on the end of those ships has since changed his now damp underwear.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Thu, 20 February 2003 18:50 |
|
Micha | | | Messages: 2342
Registered: November 2002 Location: Belgium GMT +1 | |
|
yucaf wrote on Thu, 20 February 2003 19:49 |
Chee wrote on Thu, 20 February 2003 07:45 | Thanks for your responces. I'm still trying to figure it all out. Here's some more data: The distance from Perseus to the minefield (in 2547) is 64.33 ly, the radius of the minefield is 64 ly. So I clearly should have been clear of this minefield.
Right?
|
Wrong.
Because of rounding (up), you have to be at least 65 l.y. away to be considered out of the mine field. I had this experience in several games. In your case you seem to have been unlucky indeed.
|
YucaF is right here, it is because of the rounding.
When there is a field with (taking Chee's real situation) a radius of 64ly and your fleet moves through ("to" or "from" doesn't matter) a point at 64.33ly that means you will be IN the minefield.
I just ran a test, a 56ly minefield, 300 ships at 56.85ly from that field, sending them _away_ at warp10 ... 1 ship gets killed, so Chee had some REALLY bad luck ...
I noticed stuff like this when playing SD and killed some of my own ships with a detonation, while it should have been out off the minefield ...
Going a bit off topic and more to the SD situation, the strange part was that if a fleet did NOT move but were at 64.33ly from the 64ly radius detonating field it did NOT get damaged, however if a fleet end up in space at 64.33ly from the minefield it DID get damaged!
regards,
mch
Report message to a moderator
|
|
| | |
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Fri, 21 February 2003 19:34 |
|
|
Done the thread thing...I'll let someone who knows more about it document the Minefeild rounding thing.
Ron: assuming you don't mind the thread and kill it completely...might be an idea to make it sticky
Report message to a moderator
|
|
| | |
Re: How did THAT happen?!? |
Mon, 28 April 2003 07:10 |
|
mazda | | Lieutenant | Messages: 655
Registered: April 2003 Location: Reading, UK | |
|
Chee wrote on Thu, 20 February 2003 12:45 | Thanks for your responces. I'm still trying to figure it all out. Here's some more data: The distance from Perseus to the minefield (in 2547) is 64.33 ly, the radius of the minefield is 64 ly. So I clearly should have been clear of this minefield.
|
From a viewpoint of somebody who is not completely au fait with all the mechanics.
I would think that the minefield is swept back to be exactly the same radius as your distance from it's centre.
So the minefield is 64.33 l.y. across, not the rounded down value of 64.00. (about 4138 or 4139 mines instead of 4096).
That is, I hope, without contention.
Now we know you were located at the very edge of the minefield and clearly your movement vector takes you away from the edge (or tangent) of the surface of the minefield, so mathematically you were never "in" the field.
But since minefields are quoted in whole numbers - if the minefield was 4139 mines (and perhaps me knowing the sweeping rules exactly would help here) then that is actually slightly larger than 64.33 l.y. across, so you would be "in" the field.
So when you move, your first l.y., then you are eligible for detonations.
I would call this a border condition and it's very tricky to decide whether it's right or wrong (the contentious bit).
I am the God of hell fire, and I bring you
... Brian PithersReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 03 23:37:07 EDT 2024
|