|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Tue, 04 February 2003 03:28 |
|
Nexus One | | Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 75
Registered: December 2002 Location: Szczecin, Poland | |
|
Thanks Micha - it really makes sense!
What I also noticed it that the coordinates you get when adding the numbers from destination to present position of the fleet does not give you a next waypoint coors (providing current speed is maintained), but some hypotetical coors which the fleet would pass keeping present way and speed. In other words the numbers are in fact the angle of the way the fleet has moved! But not in degrees or radians, but in form of rectangle coors. Diagonal of this rectangle is direction of the fleet's track and using arcus tangent function one can get a value of this angle.
[Updated on: Tue, 04 February 2003 03:33]
Check out my new program S!RP (test version)!
ftp://library.southern.edu/starsreportsprocessor.zip
More information in the Bar.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Thu, 06 February 2003 00:50 |
|
zoid | | Ensign | Messages: 348
Registered: December 2002 Location: Murray, KY - USA | |
|
Nexus One wrote on Tue, 04 February 2003 00:28 |
...What I also noticed wah wah wah, wah wah wah wah wah wah, wah wah. Wah wah wah wah coors wah wah wah, wah wah, wah wah wah radians wah wah wah wah wah wah. Wah wah wah coors. Wah wah wah wah, wah wah wah wah wah, wah. Wah wah wah arcus tangent function wah wah wah wah wah wah wah....Thanks Micha - it really makes sense!
| Errr, um...coors? arcus tangent? radians? This makes sense to you?
*sigh*
Some people can make me feel REALLY dumb.
I'M NOT AN EXPERT AND I'M OFTEN PROVEN WRONG. TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN YOU READ MY POSTS.
Math? Ummm, sure! I do FREESTYLE math.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Thu, 06 February 2003 10:48 |
|
|
The numbers are not where the fleet is, or going, but some place it might go (pass through) were it to keep going straight. In other words it shows the angle of the fleets movement. It displays the angle in something called rectangular coordinates. Never used those so thats where it lost me.
Email me as ----jeffimix@----yahoo.com----
(remove dashes)
The spamatron! run!!!Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Sun, 09 February 2003 16:12 |
|
Nexus One | | Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 75
Registered: December 2002 Location: Szczecin, Poland | |
|
Hi,
We had a good laugh on the "coors" theory, but now I got another on-topic question. I'll explain it in this example: a newly discovered fleet's last year waypoint (judging by its blue estimated path line) is in position (in space) I am certain I had scanned a year ago (the fleet is not cloaked). How is it possible? I am 100% sure that this alien fleet's last waypoint tick was in range of my scanners last year, but I could not detect it.
Does fleet's estimated path line (the ticks) shows always last year waypoint or e.g. if a fleet changes its speed, it isn't so?
On the other hand, if fleet's summary shows a speed a fleet moved last year(as it cannot show speed the fleet will move) it cannot have anything to do with a speed, can it?
Well, in fact it makes 3 questions.
BTW,
Thanks to jeffimix for explanation of what I tried to convey with "coors" and arcus tangent.
And for those missing the point: coors = coords = coordinates.
Sorry, but English is not my mother tongue
[Updated on: Mon, 10 February 2003 02:47]
Check out my new program S!RP (test version)!
ftp://library.southern.edu/starsreportsprocessor.zip
More information in the Bar.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Mon, 10 February 2003 17:52 |
|
|
Usually the ticks are spread by last years speed I think no ticks show when the fleet is stopped. I know that new fleets in the scan range show their ticks so that is somewhat odd.
Email me as ----jeffimix@----yahoo.com----
(remove dashes)
The spamatron! run!!!Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Tue, 11 February 2003 03:09 |
|
Nexus One | | Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 75
Registered: December 2002 Location: Szczecin, Poland | |
|
Marduk wrote on Tue, 11 February 2003 07:22 | I've noticed odd behavior with the fleet waypoint ticks. I think that if a fleet changes direction or speed, the waypoint ticks correspond to the new (future) values instead of the path it traveled in the past year.
|
I agree that future values might make sense, but only to AI-controlled fleets, however if it is so I would call it a bug. A test would solve this issue.
In case of human players (which is my case) game - it is, of course, impossible to guess by computer a human-controlled fleet's future waypoint.
I calculated also the previously mentioned numbers in the destination column for the given case, and if you do it exactly like described by Micha above, you get the same line (by joining calculated coordinates and present fleet's position) as in Stars! (the blue line) in respect of the fleet's course angel. So it does not give a clue on this matter.
Check out my new program S!RP (test version)!
ftp://library.southern.edu/starsreportsprocessor.zip
More information in the Bar.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Wed, 12 February 2003 05:35 |
|
Nexus One | | Chief Petty Officer | Messages: 75
Registered: December 2002 Location: Szczecin, Poland | |
|
tprescott wrote on Tue, 11 February 2003 14:44 | If a human player selects a deep-space waypoint to change direction of his fleet and also designates a follow-on waypoint, the blue line you see will be the new direction. Otherwise, it is the previous heading that is displayed even if the fleet comes to a stop at that point.
|
At the first glance, I though it was a solution: the blue line shows the next year waypoint, if such had been set before (if I got it right )
But when I tried to prove it in the real conditions (running 2 human players test environment), I have never got the required results. Regardless if it was a deep space location or a planet set as a second next waypoint before turn generation, the readings from the other human player scanner always indicated a previous year position as the blue line always ran through a last year position of the fleet, after the turn generation. In other words I was not able to simulated such a case. Can you please elaborate how you got your findings on that?
Check out my new program S!RP (test version)!
ftp://library.southern.edu/starsreportsprocessor.zip
More information in the Bar.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: "Destination" column in Fleet reports |
Wed, 12 February 2003 10:59 |
|
tprescott | | Crewman 1st Class | Messages: 38
Registered: December 2002 Location: ROK [GMT+9] | |
|
I just ran a test too and you seem to be right. Wierd.
I must have assumed (perhaps, now, incorrectly) the 'future track display for multiple waypoint routes' to be the case from some past in-game experiences.
I still can't help but feel that our cursory tests are missing something, but I'm afraid I don't have the time to investigate further right now.
I'm sorry if my comments on this subject have been misleading.
Tom
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|