|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: EAC vs IRC map with border |
Sat, 06 November 2004 23:33   |
|
|
|
| Ettane wrote on Fri, 05 November 2004 08:04 |
I wrote a utility that you give the ship hull type and the weight to, and it calculates the most likely ship design (going through every combination of components that match the weight). It takes hints such as if you know their race type and design, tech levels, whether mystery traders are active or not, etc.
|
I imagine a lot of people would be interested in this. You mind posting this? Would cut down a bit of time doing it manually.
As a matter of practicality, keep in mind to always have at least 1 weapons cheap race on your team in the future. };-)>
It was an interesting game to watch, and occasionally take part, even if in a half-assed kinda way.
Gakl on #stars!
Team IRC peanut gallery/alternate player
(I ran screaming in terror when I found out the universe size was HUGE.)
PS. While I have pathetically rudimentary programming skills, I'd be interested in any sort of administrative position, if *anything*'s available for a lowly liberal-arts-background tech support guy who would love to move from the NW US to SW Canada. 
g.e.
====
"When the newspapers have been read, the TV sets shut off, the cars parked
in their various garages. Then, faintly, I hear voices from another star.
(I clocked it once, and the reception is best between 3:00 A.M. and 4:45
A.M.). Of course, I don't usually tell people this when they ask, "Say,
where do you get your ideas?" I just say I don't know. It's safer."
-P. K. DickReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: EAC vs IRC map with border |
Sun, 07 November 2004 13:27 |
|
 LEit |
 | Lt. Commander |
Messages: 879
Registered: April 2003
Location: CT | |
|
Heatmizers had weapons cheap, his list of races was just where I'd had it wrong.
Here is the list updated with corrections:
1 Heatmizers non-TT CA, wide hab; weapons cheap
3 0xdeadbeef TT CA, wide hab; all expensive
5 Savage Bovines SD; IFE; elec cheap; wide hab
7 Tsunami 18% IS 5-95 in all three hab; ISB, CE; all expensive @3
9 Flood 18% IS 5-95 in all three hab; ISB, CE, RS; all expensive @3
11 Lagrangians AR; Rad Imm, others centered; ISB; en cheap
13 Charon's Army IT; NRSE, not CE; not @3; 25-75 in all 3 bands; con cheap
15 Bakuhatsu SD; not ISB; @3; wide hab; prop cheap
That means no one had bio cheap, and only one race had each of the other 5 fields cheap
[Updated on: Sun, 07 November 2004 13:34]
- LEitReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: EAC vs IRC map with border |
Sun, 07 November 2004 18:22 |
|
|
|
| LEit wrote on Sun, 07 November 2004 18:27 |
That means no one had bio cheap, and only one race had each of the other 5 fields cheap
|
So did the "all expensive" races plan to do no research whatsoever? Not easy to do.
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: EAC vs IRC map with border |
Fri, 12 November 2004 15:03 |
|
| LEit |
| Lt. Commander |
Messages: 879
Registered: April 2003
Location: CT | |
|
I've put all the IRC team files up on http://teamirc.falldowngoboom.org/
It has our .h and .x files for every year. It doesn't have EAC .h or .x files, but does have their .m files (I grabbed EACvsIRC.m* by ftp every turn).
There are also some other things we used (utilities, text files, the maps posted here).
- LEitReport message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
.