Quick SD question |
Sun, 20 August 2017 11:49 ![Go to next message Go to next message](theme/Stars/images/down.png) |
|
platon79 | ![](images/cwo3.gif) | Chief Warrant Officer 3 | Messages: 187
Registered: February 2004 Location: Norway | |
|
"You may safely travel two warp speeds faster than the stated limits through enemy mine fields."
I have always interpreted this sentence so that the maximum safe speed is raised 2 levels in the calculations.
But I guess it *could* be naively implemented with a couple of if-statements ignoring triggering the mines 2 levels up from safe speed, but it could then still be 0.9% and not 0.3% chance for warp 7 on standard fields etc. Has anyone actually tested this?
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Quick SD question |
Mon, 21 August 2017 09:33 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](theme/Stars/images/up.png) |
|
magic9mushroom | ![](images/commander.gif) | Commander | Messages: 1367
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
platon79 wrote on Mon, 21 August 2017 01:49"You may safely travel two warp speeds faster than the stated limits through enemy mine fields."
I have always interpreted this sentence so that the maximum safe speed is raised 2 levels in the calculations.
But I guess it *could* be naively implemented with a couple of if-statements ignoring triggering the mines 2 levels up from safe speed, but it could then still be 0.9% and not 0.3% chance for warp 7 on standard fields etc. Has anyone actually tested this?
Dunno if they had, but they have now. I just sent a bunch of SD frigates to their explody doom at Warp 7 through a standard minefield, and it looks a lot more like 0.3% per ly than 0.9% (84%, 83%, 85% survival; 0.3%/ly would predict 86% and 0.9%/ly 64%).
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|