| Re: The CA Crystal Ball |
Thu, 21 August 2003 22:24   |
|
 zoid |
 | Ensign |
Messages: 348
Registered: December 2002
Location: Murray, KY - USA | |
|
| overworked wrote on Thu, 21 August 2003 18:22 |
Guess you're stuck making estimates for now, unless you want to do a dump with the crystal ball on and see what it rates all the planets they're on and back analyze what ranges would produce those planet values for the race.
|
That won't provide reliable information. Lots of players colonize planets that are not yet in terraforming range but eventually will be just to establish some claim (however fragile and tenuous it may be) to the planet.
Furthermore, an IS race might colonize EVERYTHING whether it will ever be habitable or not, relying on the breeder overflow of a single transport to maintain the population for the limited resources and minerals gained (something is better than nothing). I've only played IS once and I don't know the habits of anyone else playing an IS race, but that's what I did.
Of course, one may be able to guess whether this practice is in use by carefully monitoring population growth and the nature of the starbase (if their is one) in orbit, but not necessarily with any accuracy depending on the player populating the planet. While I was playing the aforementioned IS race I maintained those unhabitable planets at their 5% capacity (generally 55k), removing excess colonists since they could not work mines or factories and their base resource output is halved, but some people exceed the 5% cap, and in varying amounts. I've seen planets that will never be habitable holding
over 200k population.
In such a case the CA trying to divine the hab ranges would estimate the players ranges to be wider than they actually are, perhaps with NO degree of accuracy.
I'M NOT AN EXPERT AND I'M OFTEN PROVEN WRONG. TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN YOU READ MY POSTS.
Math?  Ummm, sure!  I do FREESTYLE math.Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
