I agree that extracting the messages reduces the time required to find the potential cases of mine damage dodge, while providing 100% confidence that all potential cases are being detected.

If the game host wishes to monitor the game in this way and analyze each case, then this is the best known solution.

But I prefer to avoid putting anything else on the host's plate. Adding this analysis to the host's responsibilities can only slow down the game. It does potentially provide a 100% mine-damage-dodge free game. But as a player, I'm more willing to play in a game that offers a clear, simple, enforceable rule that creates known, balanced costs for employing the mine damage dodge strategy, than a game that may require the host to put the game on hold in order to examine possible cases of mine damage dodge.

I don't think banning mine damage dodge is sufficient, since it can happen unintentionally. You have to specify what the penalty will be when it does happen. And in my opinion, that penalty has to apply regardless of the intent of the dodging player.

I would not want to be the host stuck with making a judgement about a borderline case, especially if that judgement could swing the result of a game.