A> M.a... you always reply to posts in this manner. You sequentially select quotes and then answer it, while ignoring the entire flow of a post.

If you agree that chaff is allowed/'legit' because Jeffs said so, but allocation isnt ... then you are not using your own independent thought

Only because Jeffs didn't make any mention about the minefield damage ALLOCATION, that doesn't make it wrong.

C> Observe the common thread between the 2 concepts (chaff/allocation).... they both are tactics caused by game coding.

if we allow allocation, we should allow dodge as well... that won't happen.

(ps - I said this whole thing in a much more concise version in my 1st post..)
Quote:

Just because Jeffs acknowledged the chaff issue but didn't know about the other implementation of the mine damage dodge concept for mine damage allocation, doesn't mean that the mine damage allocation is an aberration.