Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Bar » NAP Breaker or not?
Re: Is Slimdragoon a NAP breaker or not ? Sat, 18 February 2012 04:28 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
goober is currently offline goober

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 175
Registered: December 2003
Location: +10
nmid wrote on Sat, 18 February 2012 14:54

goober wrote on Sat, 18 February 2012 10:15

<snip>.

Unfortunately, Player B's communication allowed Player A to define player B's legitimate actions as aggression and Player B knew that it would be interpreted that way, making them the aggressor instead.

Beautiful statesmanship on Player A's part.



Agreed... But the follow up action of attacking in subsequent years without giving the 5 year notification was poor gamesmanship.
Of course ppl do consider backstabs and NAPs valid only to the letter and clauses agreed to, as valid stratagems.
I consider them the dark side and wud stay away from players who seem to subscribe to that logic... Any agreement I have with them would be only quasi-confirmed and I would be ready for a backstab or a reinterpretation anytime.


Have to disagree. If the NAP is broken by Player B, as Player A has set it up to be with Player B's knowledge, then Player A has no obligation to wait 5 turns. They don't say the pen is mightier than the sword for nothing: don't we use diplomacy as a tool of war? Player A simply used it more effectively given the main chance.

As to it being the Dark Side, not sure how much of what we argue over can be considered darker than actively aiming to commit xenocide - which is the prime objective of the game we play.



Goober.

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Defining "standard" NAP
Next Topic: Diplomacy - honour vs credibility
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jun 10 07:17:06 EDT 2024