Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » The Bar » Which bugs should be banned?
Re: Which bugs should be banned? |
Sat, 10 July 2010 07:35 |
|
magic9mushroom | | Commander | Messages: 1361
Registered: May 2008 | |
|
m.a@stars wrote on Wed, 07 July 2010 18:13 |
magic9mushroom wrote on Wed, 07 July 2010 05:05 | What's the point of building chaff, if you can just build more of whatever you were wanting to protect and get more dp (hence more longevity) and more firepower?
|
Because all of that might still not be enough without the decoy.
|
That's literally impossible, because your decoy+real fleet will take less time to wipe out completely than an all-real fleet of the same cost.
Quote: | There are tons of reasons why most successful fleets are built of diferent designs mixed together.
|
There are, and this is not one of them.
Quote: |
Quote: | If your decoys need to cost as much as a warship, why not slap some weapons on and call it a warship?
|
Oh, they would most likely need to be a warship. Just like chaff. And yet still be just a decoy. A distraction. Something that's contributing to reach the goal only indirectly. Just like chaff.
|
I have already demonstrated why this doesn't work in the absence of the chaff hole in the targetting algorithm.
Quote: |
Quote: | Which will hopefully be less of a game-changer than chaff.
|
A decoy is a decoy is a decoy is a decoy...
The more different tactics available in battle, the better.
|
I have no clue what you're getting at here.
Quote: |
Quote: | I've already pointed out the one-line fix that would remove the chaff exploit.
|
Yeah, removing the one-line fix that the Jeffs put there for very good reasons.
|
No. I'm not talking about removing one-missile-one=kill, I'm talking about making the targetting algorithm know about one-missile-one-kill.
Unless you're telling me that it originally did, and the Jeffs deliberately made it stupider to allow chaff?
Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Which bugs should be banned?
By: gible on Thu, 18 March 2010 06:45
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: mlaub on Thu, 18 March 2010 08:40
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: mlaub on Thu, 18 March 2010 13:59
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: mlaub on Thu, 18 March 2010 13:43
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: mlaub on Thu, 18 March 2010 14:12
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: Micha on Fri, 19 March 2010 10:56
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: Micha on Thu, 01 July 2010 03:57
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: Tabini on Thu, 01 July 2010 18:34
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: gible on Fri, 02 July 2010 18:06
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: Micha on Tue, 06 July 2010 07:35
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: Tabini on Sun, 11 July 2010 14:45
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
|
|
|
Re: Which bugs should be banned?
By: Marduk on Mon, 12 July 2010 14:43
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Jun 04 10:49:17 EDT 2024
|