Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » SS » SS ultimate strategy?
Re: SS ultimate strategy? Mon, 20 April 2009 13:34 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
vonKreedon is currently offline vonKreedon

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 610
Registered: March 2003
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Altruist wrote on Mon, 20 April 2009 02:57


Do you say that there are game rules and those should be followed? But rules which you have agreed to bilateral or multilateral within the game can be handled differently and thus broken for a backstab?


Yes, I don't think that this is "weird logic". If the game rules say that CA must have 100 points to Surface Minerals and that all treaties are binding then someone who designs a CA race without leaving 100 points to Surface Minerals or someone who breaks a treaty are then breaking the rules. And, if the game rules say that each player must randomly break a treaty every ten years and a player doesn't break his one alliance because to do so would be suicide, he is also breaking the rules. OTOH, if the game rules say nothing about honoring treaties then either keeping or breaking treaties has nothing to do with breaking the rules.

Altruist further wrote on Mon, 20 April 2009 02:57


What a scum! What about the thought that within the rules you have agreed to you have lost, the other won? If you had been smart enough, you'd made another treaty or properly cancelled it early enough...
If you don't follow a treaty we have agreed upon because "to win obligates you to perform a backstab", what should made me think and trust that you follow other rules, that you don't try to use every known bug and cheat... when winning is, it seems, so overly important for you?


Treaties are agreements meant to advance one's strategic interests, not rules meant to govern how the game is played. I'm not scum and I adhere to the rules of the game and where I'm not clear about the interpretation of a rule I ask the host and follow the host's ruling.

Now you all might get the impression that I'm a backstab happy Machievellian win-at-all-cost player, but that's not really true. In my many many Stars games over the last nearly a decade and a half of playing I've only backstabbed once, and that was about 12 years ago. I agree with Altruist's sentiment that if one is smart enough about writing the treaties, and also vigilant enough to pick up strategic shifts early, one can almost always avoid having to backstab and still play to win. But....

If we take backstabbing out of the equation, if one can proceed with perfect assurance that your allies will all adhere slavishly to the letter and spirit of your treaties then IMO an important part of gameplay is removed...paranioc analysis of emerging shifts in strategic balance. Players can be lazy in communicating with each other and analyzing the strategic situation and concentrate on the math portions of the game because they know that all of the other races will let them know in a timely fashion that the strategic balance has shifted and there is no need to be proactive in this analysis.

Then there's the question of what does the game of Stars represent. I think that we can agree that it is a simulation of interstellar exploration, exploitation, and of course conquest. Being humans the only parameters that we have for these activities are human-vs-human, but we do have a lot of history to draw upon and very little of it shows the kind of rigid honor system that is being argued for here. Indeed history shows that treaties are honored as long as they are seen as being more useful then not and discarded as soon as they begin to hinder a nation's strategic goals. Our history is filled with examples of backstabs and I don't understand why my esteemed colleagues want to argue that we should play an interspecies simulation differently.

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message icon10.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon6.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: What kind of Rogue?
Next Topic: hybrid SS race; also, build order for first ~10 turns?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 02 22:27:37 EDT 2024