Home World Forum: New Game Announcements » Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted

Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » New Game Announcements » Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted

Wed, 23 April 2008 10:48

Micha

Commander

Duel Club Champion 2005

Duel Club Champion 2004

Messages: 2342
Registered: November 2002
Location: Belgium GMT +1

djf01 wrote on Wed, 23 April 2008 16:31

Well, I don't think Micha is going to reveal how he created a universe where all the HWs have <30 base mineral concentrations. I haven't been able to re-produce it (the concentrations, not the universe). I presume he's used methods us Newbies probably shouldn't know about.

HWs don't start with below 30 concentrations. And I didn't do anything special. I took the .def file, genned the universe and that was it. Nod

Quote:

I would like to know if *all* worlds are going to be similarly barren, or if it's just HWs?

Only HWs. Though I can't remember if AccBBs has an influence on non-HW concentrations as well ...

mch

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Mon, 31 March 2008 13:48
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: donjon on Mon, 31 March 2008 14:00
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Mon, 31 March 2008 15:31
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Braindead on Mon, 31 March 2008 18:53
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 01 April 2008 06:32
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: iztok on Tue, 01 April 2008 16:39
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: donjon on Tue, 01 April 2008 16:45
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Wed, 02 April 2008 03:42
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 01 April 2008 17:26
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Alter Ego on Tue, 01 April 2008 21:02
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 02 April 2008 05:13
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Mon, 31 March 2008 15:40
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Mon, 31 March 2008 18:41
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Wed, 02 April 2008 01:49
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Alter Ego on Wed, 02 April 2008 03:50
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Soobie on Wed, 02 April 2008 04:40
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 02 April 2008 05:32
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: aphar on Wed, 02 April 2008 06:21
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Kettch on Wed, 02 April 2008 08:55
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 02 April 2008 11:37
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 02 April 2008 11:49
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 02 April 2008 12:08
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 02 April 2008 13:35
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: q974739 on Wed, 02 April 2008 12:47
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 02 April 2008 13:04
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 02 April 2008 13:39
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 02 April 2008 13:53
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Wed, 02 April 2008 16:15
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 02 April 2008 18:45
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Thu, 03 April 2008 03:09
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Thu, 03 April 2008 06:02
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Fri, 04 April 2008 05:37
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Fri, 04 April 2008 16:41
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: joseph on Fri, 04 April 2008 17:58
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Sat, 05 April 2008 09:13
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 02 April 2008 13:43
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Sulpholobus on Fri, 04 April 2008 04:35
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Fri, 04 April 2008 06:01
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Mon, 07 April 2008 10:25
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Mon, 07 April 2008 14:03
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Mon, 07 April 2008 14:22
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Mon, 07 April 2008 15:02
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Mon, 07 April 2008 20:17
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: aphar on Tue, 08 April 2008 17:21
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Kettch on Tue, 08 April 2008 17:46
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 08 April 2008 20:13
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 09 April 2008 05:49
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 09 April 2008 06:55
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: joseph on Wed, 09 April 2008 07:46
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 09 April 2008 09:46
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: joseph on Wed, 09 April 2008 07:55
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 09 April 2008 09:51
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Wed, 09 April 2008 10:26
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: djf01 on Thu, 10 April 2008 06:26
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Thu, 10 April 2008 06:57
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Thu, 10 April 2008 07:30
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Thu, 10 April 2008 14:58
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Kettch on Thu, 10 April 2008 16:12
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: joseph on Thu, 10 April 2008 16:52
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Thu, 10 April 2008 18:48
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: AlexTheGreat on Fri, 11 April 2008 04:30
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Sat, 12 April 2008 10:03
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Sat, 12 April 2008 13:27
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Hilton on Sat, 12 April 2008 01:23
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Sat, 12 April 2008 09:43
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Sat, 12 April 2008 10:12
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Sat, 12 April 2008 13:28
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: joseph on Sun, 13 April 2008 07:42
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Sun, 13 April 2008 09:49
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Sun, 13 April 2008 10:16
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Hilton on Sat, 12 April 2008 11:37
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Sat, 12 April 2008 12:05
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Sun, 13 April 2008 10:34
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Sun, 13 April 2008 10:36
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: aphar on Sun, 13 April 2008 11:09
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Sun, 13 April 2008 11:53
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: joseph on Mon, 14 April 2008 03:24
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Mon, 14 April 2008 06:29
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Mon, 14 April 2008 16:44
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Mon, 14 April 2008 16:46
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: joseph on Mon, 14 April 2008 18:18
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Tue, 15 April 2008 00:45
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Hilton on Sun, 13 April 2008 19:59
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Mon, 14 April 2008 05:38
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Sulpholobus on Tue, 15 April 2008 03:43
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Tue, 15 April 2008 07:50
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Tue, 15 April 2008 08:01
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 15 April 2008 10:05
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Wed, 16 April 2008 11:07
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 16 April 2008 11:17
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Thu, 17 April 2008 07:33
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Thu, 17 April 2008 10:16
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Tue, 15 April 2008 14:53
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 15 April 2008 15:07
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Kettch on Tue, 15 April 2008 15:24
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 16 April 2008 14:24
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Thu, 17 April 2008 13:12
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Kettch on Thu, 17 April 2008 15:38
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: djf01 on Fri, 18 April 2008 03:08
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Fri, 18 April 2008 12:28
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Fri, 18 April 2008 13:43
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Fri, 18 April 2008 14:20
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Sulpholobus on Thu, 17 April 2008 17:24
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Hilton on Fri, 18 April 2008 23:56
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Sat, 19 April 2008 04:44
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Sun, 20 April 2008 09:37
		UPDATE Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Sun, 20 April 2008 15:53
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Mon, 21 April 2008 14:15
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Mon, 21 April 2008 14:21
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Mon, 21 April 2008 14:25
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Tue, 22 April 2008 04:53
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 04:56
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Tue, 22 April 2008 04:59
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 22 April 2008 06:55
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: djf01 on Tue, 22 April 2008 12:07
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Tue, 22 April 2008 11:40
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: rolfverberg on Tue, 22 April 2008 13:04
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 13:30
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 22 April 2008 13:40
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 22 April 2008 13:36
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Kettch on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:11
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Darkwyng on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:12
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:23
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Kettch on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:21
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:54
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 16:27
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Tue, 22 April 2008 17:43
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Tue, 22 April 2008 18:38
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Hilton on Tue, 22 April 2008 22:39
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: djf01 on Tue, 22 April 2008 23:08
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: djf01 on Tue, 22 April 2008 23:56
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 23 April 2008 03:00
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 03:35
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 23 April 2008 05:21
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 05:30
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 23 April 2008 07:26
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: djf01 on Wed, 23 April 2008 10:31
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 10:48
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Wed, 23 April 2008 13:24
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: jimroberts on Wed, 23 April 2008 13:43
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: donjon on Wed, 23 April 2008 15:39
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: djf01 on Wed, 23 April 2008 18:41
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Thu, 24 April 2008 02:46
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: m.a@stars on Thu, 24 April 2008 06:09
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: donjon on Thu, 24 April 2008 12:50
		Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 03:30

Previous Topic:	New game: LSD
Next Topic:	mega newb

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Mon Jun 03 02:02:24 EDT 2024