Home » Stars! 2.6/7 » New Game Announcements » Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted |
Sun, 13 April 2008 10:16 |
|
m.a@stars | | Commander | Messages: 2765
Registered: October 2004 Location: Third star to the left | |
|
joseph wrote on Sun, 13 April 2008 13:42 | I have just noticed looking at the game details that this is for beginners or near that play level.
I am definately not a beginner - so I should probably bow out
This would free up a slot for one of the people on the waiting list.
|
Awww, c'mon, not everybody will be a beginner in this game, even if some (like me) have less games under their belt than you!
I'm sure your participation would greatly enhance the overall quality and level of enjoyment of the game, be it as ally, enemy, or just role model.
After all, the game is for "beginners and players with not many multiplayer games won", so, why not play?
[Updated on: Sun, 13 April 2008 10:17]
So many Stars, so few Missiles!
In space no one can hear you scheme! Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: donjon on Mon, 31 March 2008 14:00
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: iztok on Tue, 01 April 2008 16:39
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: donjon on Tue, 01 April 2008 16:45
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Wed, 02 April 2008 03:42
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Wed, 02 April 2008 01:49
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Soobie on Wed, 02 April 2008 04:40
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: aphar on Wed, 02 April 2008 06:21
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Kettch on Wed, 02 April 2008 08:55
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: q974739 on Wed, 02 April 2008 12:47
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Wed, 02 April 2008 16:15
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Thu, 03 April 2008 03:09
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Fri, 04 April 2008 16:41
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: joseph on Fri, 04 April 2008 17:58
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: aphar on Tue, 08 April 2008 17:21
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Kettch on Tue, 08 April 2008 17:46
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: joseph on Wed, 09 April 2008 07:46
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: joseph on Wed, 09 April 2008 07:55
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: djf01 on Thu, 10 April 2008 06:26
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Thu, 10 April 2008 14:58
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Kettch on Thu, 10 April 2008 16:12
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: joseph on Thu, 10 April 2008 16:52
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Hilton on Sat, 12 April 2008 01:23
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: joseph on Sun, 13 April 2008 07:42
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Hilton on Sat, 12 April 2008 11:37
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Sun, 13 April 2008 10:34
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Sun, 13 April 2008 10:36
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: aphar on Sun, 13 April 2008 11:09
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: joseph on Mon, 14 April 2008 03:24
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: joseph on Mon, 14 April 2008 18:18
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Hilton on Sun, 13 April 2008 19:59
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Tue, 15 April 2008 07:50
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Thu, 17 April 2008 07:33
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Tue, 15 April 2008 14:53
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Kettch on Tue, 15 April 2008 15:24
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Thu, 17 April 2008 13:12
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Kettch on Thu, 17 April 2008 15:38
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: djf01 on Fri, 18 April 2008 03:08
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Hilton on Fri, 18 April 2008 23:56
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Sun, 20 April 2008 09:37
|
|
|
UPDATE Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Sun, 20 April 2008 15:53
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Mon, 21 April 2008 14:15
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Mon, 21 April 2008 14:25
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 04:56
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: djf01 on Tue, 22 April 2008 12:07
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 13:30
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Kettch on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:11
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Darkwyng on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:12
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:23
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Kettch on Tue, 22 April 2008 15:21
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Tue, 22 April 2008 16:27
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Hilton on Tue, 22 April 2008 22:39
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: djf01 on Tue, 22 April 2008 23:08
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: djf01 on Tue, 22 April 2008 23:56
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 03:35
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 05:30
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: djf01 on Wed, 23 April 2008 10:31
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 10:48
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: donjon on Wed, 23 April 2008 15:39
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: djf01 on Wed, 23 April 2008 18:41
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Thu, 24 April 2008 02:46
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: donjon on Thu, 24 April 2008 12:50
|
|
|
Re: Ten-player, diplomatic, large, dense, distant, standard (non-AccBBS), unrestricted
By: Micha on Wed, 23 April 2008 03:30
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jun 03 04:22:54 EDT 2024
|