Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » General Chat » Circular File » War on Iraq
Re: War on Iraq Sun, 30 March 2003 07:14 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
freakyboy is currently offline freakyboy

 
Lieutenant

Messages: 583
Registered: November 2002
Location: Where the clowns can't re...

Apologies to all the other countries involved. Forgiven my ignorance because I am a young soul who has based on all his opinions on the state of affairs from what he has read and been shown... which hasn't included a list of other countries involved. Maybe there should be greater show of these countries in recognition of their commitment to removing Saddam (Which i am all for, he's a bad bad man!!).

Yes I am a "peace-nik". I do not believe that anyone truely deserves to die. I don't believe Saddam should be locked in a cell to live out his days. I believe Saddam should endure the same (if not worse) treatment than the peoples of his country. Contrary to what you said Zoid you can kill a man more than once, stop his heart and then restart it (technically you don't STOP the heart, but thats a different discussion) - he would be technically dead for several seconds/minutes before he'd come back around. I'd start by strapping Saddam down in a gas chamber and filling it with knock-out gas. Imagine the fear he'd have only to wake up a few hours later. If we do capture Saddam I'd like to vote Zoid as the man in chargeof Saddams punishment... just don't kill him. I think Zoid has shown the level of hatred that Saddam deserves the wrath of.

The UN weapon inspectors were very much on the "side" of the US. They confirmed the location of many of the US weapon sites etc... - by confirmed I mean the CIA approached them saying "This is what we think they have and where. This is where and when we think Saddam is/was". And good news for the CIA was they were spot on the mark everytime. The "I" doesn't stand for idiot you know.

The reason why Blair won't get re-elected is nothing to do with standing by his values etc... It's more the fact that the majority were AGAINST the war without UN backing and the role of people like Bush and Blair is to represent the views of the majority. He didn't do that so he's lost alot of support from the opposers of war (without UN backing, I mention t
...

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: When Stars! starts it leaves my screen? :o?
Next Topic: Test Poll
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jun 01 18:27:48 EDT 2024