m.a@stars wrote on Mon, 31 July 2006 18:05

But that would mean minconcs between 30% and 40% are extremely rare for any given hab, woudln't it?

Yup. The minconcs model is... weird.

EDIT: oops, that data is for ACCBBS, dunno why I just said it was -ACCBBS... Generating some -ACCBBS data now to see how it compares.

EDIT2: what was I smoking? The published data is for -ACCBBS... I've got to rebuild my ACCBBS data using a 'clean' copy of the worksheet as I hacked up the worksheets pretty badly when I was getting my hab-correlation data, so I don't trust the graphs any more - they could be graphing anything

{Mod edit: fixed quote}

[Updated on: Tue, 01 August 2006 04:39] by Moderator

Report message to a moderator