Home World Forum
Stars! AutoHost web forums

Jump to Stars! AutoHost


 
 
Home » Primary Racial Traits » PP » PP permaforming - something is wrong?
Re: correction to spreadsheet Tue, 07 March 2006 03:02 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Tomasoid is currently offline Tomasoid

 
Chief Warrant Officer 3

Messages: 182
Registered: December 2005
Location: Ukraine

Kotk wrote on Mon, 06 March 2006 22:31

Tomasoid wrote on Mon, 06 March 2006 20:10

In the article as "actually impacted" mass was defined as a 2/3 of packet, or, if more exactly, 67% * (1-defence_coverage) * (1-caught by Mass Driver)

If you do tests we will have evidence now its just speculating. Wink

Help file say that terraform is done by minerals "not caught" = "Packet-caught".

McGuigan say that terraform minerals that "actually impacted"="2/3 of packet".

I see your tests so far support help file. Nod



Yep, for uninhabited planets. Nod
Because that confusion, that is what I run tests for too.

Looks like we got a lot of info here. Is it good to organize it as article or as FAQ?



WBR, Vlad

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: PP Packet terraforming
Next Topic: PP packet teraforming - chances calculator
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jun 08 12:55:28 EDT 2024